Los Angeles, CA asked in Contracts, Employment Law, Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation for California

Q: How many RFAs' and Rogs' questions can I ask in unlimited Civil lawsuits in California?

I've filed a lawsuit at the LA Superior Court against my employer, and 1-100 does. I am serving Rogs and RFAs. What is the most efficient way to use them without hitting the 35-question limit? Also, does the 35-question limit include both Rogs and RFAs combined, or is it for each one of them?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: In California, the limits for written discovery in unlimited civil cases are as follows:

1. Form Interrogatories (FI): No limit on the number of Form Interrogatories you can ask.

2. Special Interrogatories (SI): You are limited to 35 specially prepared interrogatories per party, unless the court grants permission for additional interrogatories.

3. Requests for Admission (RFA): There is no specific limit on the number of RFAs you can ask. However, the requests must be relevant to the case and not be unduly burdensome.

The 35-question limit applies only to Special Interrogatories and does not include Form Interrogatories or Requests for Admission.

To make efficient use of your Special Interrogatories without exceeding the 35-question limit:

1. Carefully plan your questions to cover the most important information you need.

2. Use Form Interrogatories whenever possible, as they don't count toward the 35-question limit.

3. If you need to ask more than 35 Special Interrogatories, consider requesting the court's permission to do so by demonstrating good cause.

4. Utilize Requests for Admission to establish facts that you believe are not in dispute, as this can save you from using interrogatories to gather the same information.

Remember that while there is no specific limit on RFAs, they should still be relevant and not unduly burdensome. If the opposing party finds them excessive, they may object or seek a protective order from the court.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.