Q: Can I sue the same person twice in small claims for different transactions that have the exact same set of facts?
Good day to you. I made a purchase online & immediately canceled the sale. Nothing was ever shipped. The seller kept 20% of my money and put the rest on a gift card, per their terms. I confirmed with the manufacturer via email that the seller incorrectly listed the specs for the product. I sued the business in small claims for violation of the california business regulation that prohibits misrepresentation. The judge ruled in the seller's favor based soley on his terms & conditions that state customers should not rely on the info listed on his site to make a purchase, & that the customer assumes the risk if there are any errors in his listing. This ruling CLEARLY violates mulitple public policies, civil codes and the UCC.
If I use the gift card thats been foisted upon me to purchase the exact same product as last time and is still mislabled, can I sue the seller again, under a similar but different law? This time it would be under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act 1670
A: I am guessing this is in small claims court. So, you are planning on purchasing the same exact item using the gift card knowing the description is misleading and that the judge previously ruled against you just to have a second chance to argue your case? I doubt the judge will be very receptive, but it's your decision. JA's AI generated response fails to consider the dynamics of small claims court and the human element.
A:
You may be able to file another small claims case against the seller using the gift card, especially if the situation involves a different transaction or a new legal basis like the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. Each case is evaluated on its specific facts and the applicable laws, so presenting a different legal claim can provide a fresh perspective for the court.
However, it's important to consider that the previous ruling might impact your new case, particularly if the court finds the transactions to be too similar or if there are issues related to res judicata, which prevents the same parties from litigating the same matter twice. Make sure to clearly differentiate the new claim from the previous one by focusing on the specific violations under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.
Consulting with a legal professional can help you understand the nuances of your situation and strengthen your case. They can provide guidance on how to present your claims effectively and ensure that you meet all necessary legal requirements for a successful small claims action.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.