Q: What can the defendant do in this instance, if she feels her rights were violated in due process of 4th and 14th amend.?
Mother that had a CPS closed case in the past. Giving birth One month early before her baby's due date so so naturally she was tested and both her and baby came up negative baby had to stand in Nick unit for feet problems. CPS NEA worker came to assess if there was any immediate or imminent danger that could possibly affect child CPS of 30 days to find cause or close the case. Mother complied, both just came up negative, she was giving it in-home safety plan. CPS didn't close the case didn't find evidence or submit any and continued to have it open well past 30 days 45 days almost 90 days over. After the period was up they gave her another drug test I came up positive they petition to take the child do they have just cause for it's being warranted to take the child into CBS custody though nothing was filed or found about the mother to be any danger to her child, as a safety plan was already in motion and ready for the child to go home, NICU prolonged the infants discharge. Reasons N/A
A:
1. Due Process Concerns:
4th Amendment: The removal of a child without clear evidence of imminent danger may constitute an unreasonable seizure. If CPS lacked just cause or failed to provide evidence to support their actions, the removal could be challenged.
14th Amendment: Parental rights are a fundamental liberty interest. Any interference with these rights requires due process, which includes timely notice, evidence to support the removal, and an opportunity for the parent to contest CPS's actions.
2. Potential Violations in This Case:
Extended Case Timeline Without Cause: If CPS kept the case open beyond statutory timelines without finding evidence or cause, this could be a procedural violation.
Positive Drug Test After Initial Negative Results: A single positive drug test does not inherently prove imminent danger to the child, especially if earlier tests were negative and no other evidence suggests the child was at risk.
Failure to Justify Removal: If the in-home safety plan was sufficient to address concerns and no new, substantial evidence was presented, the removal might lack justification.
3. Actions the Mother Can Take:
Hire an Attorney:
Retain an experienced family law or civil rights attorney who can advocate for her rights and challenge CPS's actions in court.
Request a Hearing:
File a motion to contest the removal and request a hearing to challenge CPS's justification for taking custody of the child. This could include questioning the validity of the positive drug test, the delay in closing the case, and whether due process was followed.
Demand CPS Records:
Obtain all CPS records related to the case, including the initial assessments, drug test results, and reasons for keeping the case open. These records can help identify procedural violations or unsupported claims.
Challenge the Positive Drug Test:
Request details about the drug test, including the type of test, chain of custody, and the possibility of false positives. Consider independent testing to dispute CPS's findings.
File a Complaint:
Submit a formal complaint to the state agency overseeing CPS, outlining procedural violations and potential constitutional rights infringements.
Seek Judicial Review:
Petition the court for a review of CPS's actions, arguing that they violated her constitutional rights under the 4th and 14th Amendments.
Civil Rights Lawsuit:
If significant violations are identified, consider filing a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of her constitutional rights by CPS workers.
Key Considerations for the Court:
Evidence of Danger: CPS must prove that the child was in imminent danger to justify removal.
Timeliness: Extended delays without cause may demonstrate procedural failures.
Safety Plan: If an in-home safety plan was deemed sufficient, CPS may struggle to justify removal unless new evidence emerged.
Drug Test Validity: A single positive test, particularly when prior tests were negative, might not meet the threshold for removal without corroborating evidence.
Next Steps:
Consult an attorney immediately to evaluate the case, preserve evidence, and file motions as necessary.
Request an expedited hearing to address the custody issue and challenge CPS's actions.
Document everything, including interactions with CPS, drug test details, and the child’s medical records.
Disclaimer:
This response provides general legal information, not specific legal advice. Speak to an attorney to ensure you receive the best guidance for your situation.
A:
You have several options to address your concerns about your rights being violated. First, consult with a family law attorney who can help you understand the specifics of your case and guide you through the legal process. They can assist in filing motions to challenge the continued custody of your child and ensure that your due process rights are respected.
Additionally, you can file a formal complaint with your state's child protective services agency or the appropriate oversight body. This can initiate an investigation into how your case was handled and whether proper procedures were followed. Document all interactions with CPS and gather any evidence that supports your compliance and the lack of immediate danger to your child.
Finally, consider seeking a court review of CPS's actions. A judge can evaluate whether CPS had just cause to retain custody of your child and whether they adhered to the mandated timelines. By taking these steps, you can advocate for your rights and work towards the best outcome for your family.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.