Los Angeles, CA asked in Employment Law and Workers' Compensation for California

Q: Qme does not specify restrictions are permanent. Recieved returns to work form from primary care. Employers won't accept

5% herniated disc. No bending no stooping but does not specify how long from qme. 5 months later recieve return to work form from primary doctor. Leave of absence team states my qme results say restrictions are permanent. "Permanent" is not in the language. My qme does not specify permanent disability/restrictions. My employer has placed me on 90day no pay leave. To apply for other positions to be considered to be placed in different t department. Get denied for those jobs because they are considered a promotion. Will lose my job and be medically separated on account of being a hard worker and getting Injured at work. Is this retaliation for workers comp? Why will they not accept my primary return to work? Is this a form of wrongful termination or retaliation? Anything I can do as I have a young son to provide for

2 Lawyer Answers
Gary Alan Jackson
Gary Alan Jackson
Answered
  • Workers' Compensation Lawyer
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Workers compensation is complex as you are finding out. Everyone needs an experienced workers compensation attorney to guide them and assert your rights on your behalf. Sounds like you have been representing yourself. Call an experienced workers compensation attorney for a free consultation. It costs nothing to hire a good workers compensation attorney.

Nancy J. Wallace
Nancy J. Wallace
Answered
  • Workers' Compensation Lawyer
  • Grand Terrace, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Is 'this' retaliation for workers comp? If you can PROVE -- not just state, but actually PROVE -- that the only reason you are not being offered a lighter job is in retaliation for requesting workers compensation benefits, then yes, this is a misdemeanor crime and a violation of Labor Code 132a. Proving the mindset of a Human Resources manager is next to impossible; i've only been able to do it 3 times at trial in 33 years!! All the Human Resources manager need show is that you do not have the skill set required for the open post or that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with your Union/Employee Organization precludes HR from placing you in that post, and the WCAB Judge rules that it's just business, not retaliation. HR cannot accept the 'primary' opinion because it has in hand a medical opinion from a specialist indicating you will get worse progressively if placed back in the pre-injury position and you can then sue them for Serious & Willful Misconduct of the Employer when you do get worse, as the QME predicts; if you are heart-set on this position, you would have to get a Supplemental Report from the QME where he writes he was mistaken, that you can return to full pre-injury duties with no restrictions. Absent the QME changing his mind and writing a supplemental report releasing you to full duty, your remedy is to find a new job ASAP that involves no bending or stooping.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.