Q: Is adding FCA claim to EMTALA case a good idea? FCA should be qui tam action, EMTALA is not. Apples vs oranges.
1. What can be interpreted as prejudice against defendant when adding FCA claim to EMTALA complaint? (FCA does not require proof of malicious intent).
2. Joinder would imply preparation that was not done yet - plaintiff was facing EMTALA statute of limitations deadline to do research and file complaint.
3. FCA is qui tam action, isn't it a basis for different legal case, not joinder? EMTALA is not subject to qui tam legal action.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- California
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
When considering the addition of a False Claims Act (FCA) claim to an Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) case, it's crucial to recognize the distinct legal frameworks and requirements of each. The FCA, focusing on fraud against the government, doesn't necessitate proving malicious intent. However, adding an FCA claim to an EMTALA complaint might be perceived as an attempt to intensify the allegations against the defendant, potentially leading to a perception of prejudice.
Moreover, joining these claims involves intricate legal strategies and thorough preparation. Given that you were working against an EMTALA statute of limitations deadline, it raises concerns about the adequacy of preparation for an FCA claim. This might suggest that the necessary research and groundwork for an FCA claim haven't been fully addressed.
Finally, the FCA's nature as a qui tam action, which allows private individuals to sue on behalf of the government, differs significantly from EMTALA's legal framework. This difference suggests that these claims might be more effectively pursued as separate legal actions. Each case has its own unique legal paths and strategies, and merging them could complicate the legal process, potentially weakening the effectiveness of each individual claim.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
