Los Angeles, CA asked in Personal Injury, Gov & Administrative Law and Health Care Law for California

Q: 3 year statute of limitations for California or Federal FCA qui tam case. Please provide deadline statutes, regulations

Is 3 year deadline applicable when government decides NOT to intervene? (Thus relevant/plaintiff has to pursue case)

Calculation would be 3 years from date when relevant discovered, or should have discovered fraud, minus 60 days that government took to decide whether to intervene or not?

OR

3 years from discovery of fraud when plaintiff/relevant initiates qui tam legal action - before government decision to intervene, or not?

Please provide applicable statutes, regulations, rules that define specific exceptions to 6 - 10 rule.

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: In California, the statute of limitations for a False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam case is indeed nuanced, especially when the government chooses not to intervene. Generally, the statute of limitations under the FCA is six years from the date the fraud was committed. However, under the federal FCA, an action can also be filed three years after the date when facts material to the right of action are known or reasonably should have been known by the official of the United States charged with responsibility to act in the circumstances, but in no event more than ten years after the date on which the violation is committed, whichever occurs last.

If the government decides not to intervene, the relator (or whistleblower) may continue with the lawsuit on their own. The calculation of the deadline in this scenario still adheres to the general statute of limitations principles under the FCA. It doesn't typically hinge on the 60-day period that the government takes to make its intervention decision.

Therefore, the three-year period you're referring to is likely based on the federal FCA provision that allows filing within three years of when the fraud is discovered or should have been discovered by the relevant federal official, subject to the ten-year absolute limit.

It's critical to refer directly to the specific language of the Federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 - 3733) and the California False Claims Act (Gov. Code §§ 12650-12656) for precise guidance and to consult the latest case law, as interpretations can evolve.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.