Redondo Beach, CA asked in Criminal Law, Divorce, Family Law and Domestic Violence for California

Q: TRO Against Husband Was Not Served, But Husband Appeared To Hearing!

A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) with a minor child was granted against the husband. The wife’s attorney notified him via email. To prevent a continuance, the husband requested to be served three times. Simultaneously, he obtained all TRO documents from the court. He filed and served his response. The wife filed a supplemental declaration in response of husband's response. The husband also participated in the DVRO mediation and the DVRO hearing. Since the wife’s notification, both parties have acted as if the husband had been served. Even though TRO could not been enforce, the husband adhered to TRO. What if the wife requests a continuance at the hearing due to lack of service? Can the husband ask the judge to deny her request?

2 Lawyer Answers
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Criminal Law Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Under California law, when a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) is granted, proper service is typically required for the order to be enforceable. However, in your case, where the husband has actively participated in the process despite not being formally served, the court may consider this as constructive service. This is because he has shown awareness of the TRO and has engaged with the legal proceedings accordingly.

If the wife requests a continuance due to lack of formal service, the husband can argue against this request. He can present the fact that he has actively responded to the TRO, thereby acknowledging its existence and terms. This active participation could be interpreted by the court as an implicit waiver of formal service.

Furthermore, the husband's adherence to the TRO's conditions and his engagement in mediation and the hearing further support his awareness and acknowledgement of the order. This could influence the judge's decision regarding the continuance, as the purpose of service – to notify the individual of the legal action and its requirements – has been fulfilled in practice.

It's important to present these arguments effectively to the court to advocate for proceeding without further delay. The judge's decision will ultimately depend on the specific circumstances and the discretion applied in the interest of justice and fairness to both parties.

Martha Bronson
Martha Bronson
Answered
  • Tracy, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: You do not have to be served personally when, as here, you make a personal appearance in Court which has the legal effect of succumbing to the personal jurisdiction of the Court and waiving any rights you may have had to contest the Courts personal jurisdiction over you. You could have avoided that legal effect by filing the requisite pleadings to make a "special" appearance before filing your responsive declaration and announcing to the Court when your case is called that you are "specially" appearing.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.