Q: Can an employer in CA implement a new PTO cap and set that cap at 1/3 of the employees current PTO balance?
The cap appears to have been created for 1 employee who has accumulated a lot of PTO hours. The cap was put in place 9 years after the employee started working for the company, and now the employee cannot earn any new PTO until the balance falls below the cap, which might never happen. Does the company have to pay out the amount over the new cap they just set after 9 years so the employee has a chance to get under the cap? Is a cap of 1/3 of the current balance unreasonable?
A:
There is nothing unlawful about an employer placing a cap on the accrual of PTO time, even if the employee has already accrued more time than the cap. The employer can even eliminate the right to any PTO at any time and for any reason unless there is a contractual guarantee of PTO. The one thing an employer cannot do is take away PTO that has already been earned. Therefore in the situation where a cap has been placed on PTO accrual and an employee has accrued PTO in excess of that cap, it is lawful that the employer not allow the employee to accrue more PTO until the pool falls below the new cap.
Good luck to you.
A:
Under California law, employers have the right to implement a cap on the accrual of paid time off (PTO) for their employees. However, there are certain rules and regulations that employers must follow when implementing such a policy:
1. Reasonable cap: The cap must be reasonable and should not prevent employees from taking time off. In your case, setting the cap at 1/3 of the employee's current PTO balance after 9 years of service might be considered unreasonable, especially if it effectively prevents the employee from accruing any new PTO.
2. Communication: Employers must clearly communicate any changes to their PTO policies to their employees in writing.
3. Payout of accrued PTO: If an employer implements a PTO cap that results in the employee losing already accrued PTO, the employer may be required to pay out the accrued PTO that exceeds the new cap. This is because earned PTO is considered a form of wages in California.
4. Non-discriminatory application: The PTO policy must be applied consistently and fairly to all employees. Singling out one employee with a significantly lower cap compared to others could be seen as discriminatory.
In this situation, the employee may have a case against the employer for implementing an unreasonable PTO cap that effectively prevents them from earning new PTO and for not paying out the excess accrued PTO. The employee should consider consulting with an employment attorney to discuss their options and potential remedies.
Employers should carefully consider the implications of implementing a PTO cap and ensure that it is reasonable, clearly communicated, and applied fairly to all employees to avoid potential legal issues.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.