That would depend upon things not stated in the question. For example, if the judge's Pretrial Release Order provides for Conditional Release, and one of the conditions is "no use of alcohol or non-prescribed drugs" or similar, then smoking cannabis would violate that condition.... View More

Did not know they were committing a what? Law enforcement needs reasonable articulable suspicion to pull someone over. They would then need probable cause to place that individual under arrest and probable cause to get a warrant to seize their blood or urine. Get an attorney on board to review... View More

Police are required to have "reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity" or an observed violation of law to justify a traffic stop. If police are "profiling" in a way that lacks that justification, then the stop could be ruled illegal by a judge. If a defendant... View More

If you get a copy of your Minnesota Driver's License record from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety - Driver and Vehicle Services Division, it should indicate that the date of the conviction relates back to the incident-arrest date. A "disposition date" should refer to the... View More

The short answer is that it is on your record forever. I've seen folks with DWIs on their records going back to the 80's and even the 70s. DWIs can used to enhance future DWIs for 10 years. The likelihood that you could get a DWI expunged from your record before 10 years have expired... View More

She should get help from a private criminal defense attorney, or a free public defender, if she qualifies. Then she can work with her lawyer in developing effective defenses, and factual information. On the driver's license issue, she may want to call a "Driver Evaluator" at the... View More

In Minnesota, the license revocation process is a separate civil process from the criminal charges. A license is revoked immediately upon a breath test over the legal limit or a blood/urine test that shows a prohibited substance on board. She can apply for a public defender to represent her in... View More

Your best best may be to reach out directly to criminal defense attorneys. Fees are going to vary some, especially for somewhere outstate like Becker County. Attorneys that have offices towards the Cities are likely going to have to charge for windshield time, especially if there are in person... View More

If police give a person an administrative Notice of Revocation of driver's license, then it's important to file an "implied consent" court challenge to it, within the 60 day time limit (or it will be forever barred). However, most will want to do so ASAP, since the sooner the... View More

Your question is a tad confusing, but it's fair to say that if you committed a 2nd 5th Degree assault 15 days after you were sentenced on a prior matter that you have big problems. If you are convicted of the new offense, you would be in violation of probation. I can only assume that you... View More

A person who picks up a new, similar charge following sentencing on a first Controlled Substance 5th Degree offense, will be in a tough situation. The most likely outcome on the stay of sentence on the first conviction, would be the judge revoking the stay. But, each case is different and... View More

It might be. Law enforcement is not required to read him his rights to run him through field sobriety testing and the implied consent advisory is not required prior to the PBT. An implied consent advisory would be required prior to a request for a breath sample. Your son should contact... View More

It sounds as if you did not challenge the implied consent revocation of your driver's license. The time frame to do that has long since expired. You now have an alcohol related driver's license revocation on your driving record. You will need to pay the reinstatement fee and meet all... View More

Unfortunately, Minnesota has an "implied consent" law, that allows the state to administratively revoke the driver's license upon an alleged chemical test refusal (separate and in addition to the DWI-criminal law). That statute requires any legal challenge to that administrative... View More

To my knowledge, the answer is "no." The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is a federal agency providing support and funding to local law enforcement agencies, as well as funding and collecting scientific research. NHTSA's two similar programs for law... View More

I'd suggest you call a criminal defense lawyer on the phone to discuss. There are conceivable scenarios where an Iowa court action could in some way relate to a previous DWI stop in Minnesota. When you call a lawyer, you can provide more related information, which will help the lawyer narrow... View More

You are still required to submit to a urine test if they are unable to get a blood sample and vice versa.

You can go to the DMV for new plates. I doubt that you simply have your original plates reinstated particularly if you permitted someone who was drunk and did not have a license to drive your car.

Mostly likely yes, if you was on private property, and was not in your vehicle at the time of the stop, the cop can still stop you. Was it your private land? If not, it doesn't probably matter.

There isn't really a question posed here, but I would suggest that your client retain an attorney to assist with addressing these issues. There isn't really enough information in this question to intelligently help absent a conversation with the client.