This would likely turn on how long ago this was. Assuming you were a minor, that would toll the statute of limitations, but only while you remained a minor. A tort claim notice also would be needed.

This would be an issue of contract, as employers are not required to provide any sort of paid time off, including holidays (assuming this is not a government job). So it comes down to what exactly are the employers' policies.

You have several questions. Unless the employer lied to the police, there is no bad faith for turning over the emails. As to the rest, I would find a labor law attorney (labor law deals with union jobs) and sit down for a free consultation to discuss if you have a case.

If seven months have already passed, you may already be too late as a tort claim notice had to be sent within 180 days.

Relapse on what? If you are talking about an addiction issue, one might have some protections via the ADA.

Never heard of something like this, but in a sense it is good for you in that if they fire you now you would likely not be eligible for unemployment. Generally if you are fired for cause, you do not get unemployment (there are exceptions though). My guess is that the contract your employer is... View More

There is no law requiring them to let her apply again, nor controlling how long they can make her wait.

In such a situation, an employer (or potentially a just a business you have a contract with) would still owe the wages. The problem is, if this person does not have the money, then you would have a difficult time collecting what is owed. Further, your contract is likely with the company, which is... View More

Employers can put employees on corrective actions for almost any reason, as employment is at will. An employer could even just fire an employee for not responding to emails promptly (assuming the employer does not have a progressive discipline policy).

Attorneys cannot solicit your business, so you would have to find an attorney and contact them. You can Google search employment law attorney and your city, or use the find a lawyer link here on Justia to find someone who does employment law. Then check out their online presence to ensure they do... View More

This would depend on a detailed reading of all of the correspondence to see if any sort of contract or license was created to allow you to use the logo. As a general proposition, the person who creates the work of art owns the copyright. One exception is what is called a work for hire, which may... View More

Can you sue someone in the UK even though you are in the US, yes, you would need to find a UK lawyer (though I think they are called barristers and solicitors there) to accomplish this.

Potentially, but there are issues related to both copyright and trademark involved. Fair use may be a defense, but more information would be needed to see if there is a way to avoid liability.

While this person is partly correct that the combination does create a new work of art that would have it's own copyright, the fact remains that the collage would be a derivative work of the original art works. As in, making the collage without the permission of the copyright holders of the... View More

All of the pictures you are talking about are copyrighted, and you would need a license to legally do what you want to do. In addition to copyright issues, there are are personality rights to deal with that you would need to contract with the celebrities to use their likeness.

In order to avoid legal issues you would need a license from the copyright holder of the three photos, and then also a license from the trademark holder for the character. This assumes the character is trademarked and the photos you used are copyrighted.