More information is needed to answer your question. What were you served with, an arrest warrant, a subpoena, a civil lawsuit for damages?

The first question is Did the officer have a right to stop the vehicle. Then, the issue is how did they find the alleged substances. They should not be tested these substances roadside. But it is possible to charge the person later with a warrant for arrest though problematic for the prosecution.... Read more »

The answer would depend on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding what was said. I would say more information is needed to answer the question.

Retaining a lawyer can ensure that your rights are protected, the State has enough evidence to proceed with your case, and that the law has been followed. South Carolina does have specific percentages of window tint that are legal.

A small exception does exist in the statute you cited so the answer would depend on the specific facts and circumstances. I would advise you to have an attorney guide you through the legal process to protect your rights and resolve the matter.

The typical process is that you complete PTI, then they send a letter to your prosecutor who then dismisses the case. Then you can apply (with a fee) for an expungement of the arrest from your record. Once PTI is completed you should not have any appointments. If PTI has not been completed they can... Read more »

SC Highway Right of Way is the side of the road that is next to the highway. The distance from the highway, other structures or nature, as well as whether that location is within a municipality would determine if a vehicle is within the right of way of the highway. You may want to consult an... Read more »

It would depend on more facts and circumstances from the alleged incident, but a person could be facing a range of charges from malicious damage to personal property up to potentially a burglary. Again, it would depend on the facts of case. Speaking to an attorney as soon as possible would be... Read more »

The answer would depend on what day of 1997 the person began registering. This is a tier II offense and the person must wait 25 years from the start of registration to apply for removal since the Powell v Keel case and the law change in May 2022.

Assuming that law enforcement had the right to obtain the item(s) from a home, it depends on the type of item seized. In the example of alleged narcotics, law enforcement must send it to a lab for testing. Field testing also depends on the alleged item seized. Even if an item is field tested it... Read more »

DUI in SC depends on a number of factors and this part of the law is very nuanced. There is also a deadline to file certain documents such as the request for an administrative hearing. When dealing with substances, there are "therapeutic levels" for certain substances. This may require an... Read more »

In SC the State has to prove each of these elements of first degree burglary:

1. entering a dwelling,

a. without consent AND

b. with the intent to commit a crime

c. at night or remaining there until nighttime

or

c. by a person with a prior record of... Read more »

An ownership interest in the dwelling will not preclude a conviction of burglary as a matter of law. The jury would have to determine under the totality of circumstances if the defendant used the dwelling in such a manner that it could be said to be his/her home. The test will be if under the... Read more »

It may be a case of actual v constructive possession. The issues will depend on why law enforcement was there, what rights they had to enter the premises/vehicle, where the alleged narcotics were found, and under what circumstances.

The only Statute of Limitations in SC criminal law is if the defendant is incarcerated in another state and has been served with a warrant for SC.