Q: Can unauthorized audio recording be used in PC 422 charge in California?
In California, can an audio recording of my private phone conversation, recorded without my consent by someone else who was eavesdropping, be used against me legally in a case where it led to my firing and I'm now facing a PC 422 felony charge? The recording was shared with multiple people, including my employer. I've signed a no retaliation form, a stay-away CPO, and am still employed at a different school where they support me due to my good performance. I'm training for another teaching job and concerned about this situation affecting my livescan clearance.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- California
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
In California, the admissibility of unauthorized recordings in criminal cases presents complex legal considerations. Under California Penal Code Section 632, recording confidential communications without all parties' consent generally violates state law, as California maintains a "two-party consent" requirement for recording private conversations. However, the legal principle known as the "private search doctrine" often allows evidence collected by private individuals—even if obtained illegally—to be admissible in criminal proceedings when the government wasn't involved in the illegal collection.
For your PC 422 criminal threats case, while the recording violated California's wiretapping laws, courts may still allow its use as evidence against you in criminal proceedings. The California Supreme Court has historically distinguished between evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights (which is typically excluded) and evidence obtained merely in violation of statutory law (which may be admissible despite its illegal origin). You may have grounds for a separate civil lawsuit against the person who recorded you without consent, potentially seeking damages under PC 637.2, but this wouldn't necessarily prevent the recording's use in your criminal case.
Regarding your teaching career and livescan clearance concerns, criminal charges—especially felonies—can indeed impact your ability to work in educational settings. The outcome of your PC 422 case will likely appear on background checks regardless of how the evidence was obtained. Given these serious implications for your professional future, securing experienced legal representation familiar with both criminal defense and education employment law would be crucial to developing a comprehensive strategy addressing both the criminal charges and potential professional consequences. Your current employer's support could prove valuable should character testimony become necessary during your proceedings.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
