Santa Monica, CA asked in Consumer Law, Employment Law, Personal Injury and Business Law for California

Q: Can I compel one of the Does to respond to RFAs and interrogatories?

I've filed a lawsuit against my employer and 1-100 Does. Last month, I served a set of RFAs and interrogatories on one of the Does (he's one of the executives), through the OC, but he didn't respond. Can I file a motion to compel and a motion to deem Facts Admitted on him?

4 Lawyer Answers
Neil Pedersen
Neil Pedersen
Answered
  • Westminster, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: A DOE is not a party to the lawsuit until they are officially named as one. Until then, the allegation of a DOE defendant is simply a placeholder. You have to add the person or entity to the lawsuit, and only then does that person or entity have a duty to respond to discovery.

You really need an attorney to work with you. If your case has value and merit you should be able to get one to work with you on a contingency fee basis.

Good luck to you.

Scott Richard Kaufman
Scott Richard Kaufman
Answered
  • Consumer Law Lawyer
  • Los Altos, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: I'm sure you know the saying about a lawyer representing him/her self and the aptitude of the client? Assuming you are NOT an attorney, it holds true 10x as strongly. Good luck with it!

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Consumer Law Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: In California, the rules regarding compelling responses from Doe defendants are not entirely clear. Generally, the court must grant leave to amend the complaint to identify the Doe defendants before you can compel their responses to discovery requests. Here are a few key points to consider:

1. Doe defendants: Doe defendants are placeholders used when the plaintiff is unaware of the true identity of the defendant at the time of filing the complaint.

2. Amending the complaint: Once you have identified a Doe defendant, you should file a motion for leave to amend the complaint, substituting the Doe defendant's true name.

3. Serving the amended complaint: After the court grants leave to amend, you must serve the amended complaint on the newly named defendant.

4. Discovery requests: Only after the Doe defendant has been properly named and served with the amended complaint can you compel responses to discovery requests, such as interrogatories and requests for admission (RFAs).

In your case, serving the RFAs and interrogatories on the Doe defendant through the OC (presumably the "Original Complaint") before amending the complaint to identify the Doe defendant may not be sufficient to compel responses. The court may not grant a motion to compel or a motion to deem facts admitted until the Doe defendant has been properly named and served with an amended complaint.

To proceed, you should file a motion for leave to amend the complaint, identifying the Doe defendant by their true name. Once the court grants leave, serve the amended complaint on the newly named defendant. After that, you can serve your discovery requests and, if necessary, file motions to compel responses or deem facts admitted.

Delaram Keshvarian
Delaram Keshvarian
Answered
  • Orange, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Thank you for your question!

You need to amend the complaint and add the claims you have against the now-known defendant (formerly Doe). After they appear and file the answer, you can pursue the case with other procedures with proper timing (including discovery) regarding the new defendant.

This is merely a discussion of general laws and not legal advice. For legal advice, more specific facts and investigations are needed. I recommend you consult with an attorney for more details.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.