Ask a Question

Get free answers to your Health Care Law legal questions from lawyers in your area.

Lawyers, increase your visibility by answering questions and getting points. Answer Questions
California Health Care Law Questions & Answers
1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law for California on
Q: Proof of affiliation of a person with third-party to lawsuit.

What proof of affiliation between third-party business entity and person can be requested from hospital, if hospital disclosed to third-party entity data of hospital patient?

Person's name is known from records, who exactly generated records from software system, but his affiliation... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024

In a situation where a hospital has disclosed a patient's data to a third-party entity, and you suspect that the person who accessed the records is affiliated with that third party, you may request the following information from the hospital to establish proof of affiliation:

1. Access...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law, Legal Malpractice and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: Statute/rule of court for plaintiff's demand of privilege log

How to initiate request for privilege log with defense, when request for privilege log is production request?

What statute/rule of court defines this process?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

In California, the process for requesting a privilege log is governed by the California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and the California Rules of Court (CRC). Here are the relevant rules and statutes:

1. CCP § 2031.240 - Motion to Compel Further Response to Inspection Demand:

If a...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes, Health Care Law and Legal Malpractice for California on
Q: What such situation has to do with protective order?

In this particular case, the question is not about defendant to depose plaintiff.

The question is about defendant's responses to 'produce person for deposition' in instead of disclosure of inquired identity.

In this case plaintiff cannot be obliged to depose a person,... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, a protective order is a court order that is designed to protect a person from harassment, stalking, or abuse. It can be used to prevent the defendant from contacting the plaintiff, coming near them, or engaging in other specified behaviors.

In the context of a legal...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes, Health Care Law and Legal Malpractice for California on
Q: Matters crucial for discovery. Enforcement

Defendant hospital can find many triggers for objections. However, when subject matter of particular discovery responses is crucial for the case,

Motion to compel with demand to produce privilege log Is the only tool available to obtain any meaningful responses?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, when a defendant hospital objects to discovery requests and the subject matter of those requests is crucial to the case, filing a motion to compel along with a demand for a privilege log can be an effective tool to obtain meaningful responses. Here's why:

1....
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Civil Litigation and Health Care Law for California on
Q: If court orders defendant to disclose information

How defendant hospital can confront, appeal, or disobey court order to disclose contractual agreements with hospital providers?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, there are several key elements that should be included in a contract to ensure its validity and authenticity:

1. Identities of the parties: The full legal names and contact information of all parties involved in the contract should be clearly stated.

2. Terms...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Legal Malpractice and Health Care Law for California on
Q: Legal verification of authenticity

With depositions out of question: How to legally verify that hospital/provider contracts, disclosed by hospital are authentic?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, there are a few ways to legally verify the authenticity of hospital/provider contracts without relying on depositions:

1. Request certified copies: You can request certified copies of the contracts directly from the hospital. A certified copy is a copy of a document...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Contracts and Health Care Law for California on
Q: what is the way to request court order, before privilege log is created?

Absent court order, does hospital have obligation during discovery to disclose contracts with hospital provider?

If court order is necessary, what is the way to request court order, before privilege log is created?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, a hospital generally does not have an obligation to disclose contracts with hospital providers during discovery unless specifically requested and ordered by the court. These contracts may contain sensitive or privileged information, and the hospital may object to their... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Contracts and Health Care Law for California on
Q: How to request court order to disclose

Since it is known that defendant hospital can object disclosure of contract with provider, how to skip in discovery additional steps or delays;

and ask court to grant order to disclose contracts instead of - or in parallel - with production demand?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

In California, you can request a court order to compel the disclosure of contracts between a defendant hospital and a provider through a motion to compel discovery. This process allows you to seek the court's intervention to obtain the desired documents without going through the typical... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law and Legal Malpractice for California on
Q: Producing person for deposition instead of verifiable data - oppressive and burdensome

Producing person by defense for deposition instead of verifiable data.

Isn't such response of defense burdensome, oppressing and harassing for in pro per plaintiff who propounds request for verifiable data or documents?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, the use of depositions as a means of obtaining information that could be more easily obtained through other discovery methods, such as interrogatories or requests for production of documents, can be considered oppressive, burdensome, and harassing, particularly for... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Contracts and Health Care Law for California on
Q: Exception from privilege, discoverability. Statute

What statutes define that data: license #, degree, dates of employment of hospital provider;

Is discoverable not privileged, as long as relevant?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, certain information about healthcare providers, including their license number, degree, and dates of employment at a hospital, may be discoverable and not protected by privilege if the information is relevant to a legal case. The key statutes that address this are:

1....
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Contracts and Health Care Law for California on
Q: What rules of court are relevant to data disclosure during discovery

What rules of court are relevant to data disclosure during discovery

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

Under California law, there are several rules of court that are relevant to data disclosure during the discovery process. Here are some of the key rules:

1. California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) Section 2019.040: This rule sets forth the scope of discovery, stating that parties may...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law, Consumer Law and Contracts for California on
Q: Ways to block disclosure of data by hospital

How defendant hospital can prevent, confront, or disobey court order to disclose contractual or employment record between hospital and providers?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024

To address a court order for disclosure of data, you can start by asserting physician-patient privilege, which may apply if the records contain sensitive patient information. Argue that the release of these documents would violate confidentiality agreements and patient privacy rights, as protected... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Legal Malpractice, Contracts and Health Care Law for California on
Q: Privileged vs non-privileged data of hospital provider in legal discovery

In order to achieve verifiable authentic data.

Contract or employment term with hospital provider includes identification of the person. Discoverable?

Is profession, license id included, degree, dob protected in discovery?

What data of hospital provider does not fall under... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 16, 2024

In legal discovery in California, there are certain types of data related to hospital providers that are considered privileged and protected from disclosure, while other types of data are generally discoverable. Here's a breakdown:

Privileged data (generally not discoverable without...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law for California on
Q: In summary. Motion for in camera review is served with motion to compel, after privilege log was created.

In summary. Motion for in camera review of privilege log is served with motion to compel further; after privilege log was created by defendant in response to production request, that was included into plaintiff's discovery requests. Correct?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 16, 2024

Yes, that is generally correct under California law. Here's a summary of the process:

1. The plaintiff serves discovery requests on the defendant, which may include requests for production of documents.

2. The defendant responds to the discovery requests and produces a...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes, Health Care Law and Legal Malpractice for California on
Q: Re: reasonable way to handle situation

Motion for protective order is not relevant for the situation.

Plaintiff requests defendant to create privilege log in production request and to disclose private information of individuals.

Can motion for camera review and motion for court order for disclosure of private data be... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 16, 2024

Here are the steps I would recommend for handling this situation in California:

1. Serve the production requests and special interrogatories on the defendant. In the requests, ask the defendant to produce a privilege log identifying any documents withheld on the basis of privilege. Also...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law for California on
Q: Demand for disclosure by hospital of affiliation of provider

During discovery, what verification of employment, or of contract with service provider hospital has to disclose?

How such production demand must be phrased to ensure authenticity?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 16, 2024

Under California law, a party can request information about the affiliation of a healthcare provider with a hospital during the discovery process. This is typically done through a request for production of documents or interrogatories. To ensure the authenticity of the information provided, the... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes, Health Care Law and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: Specific authorities, case law. Precedents of camera review for fraudulent unauthorized disclosure of information.

Specific authorities, case law. Precedents of camera review for fraudulent unauthorized disclosure of medical information.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 15, 2024

For the most accurate and up-to-date information, I would strongly recommend consulting with a licensed California attorney who specializes in health law and privacy matters. They will be able to research the relevant statutes, case law, and legal precedents and provide you with a detailed... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law and Legal Malpractice for California on
Q: Specific authorities : Res Ipsa Loquitur - specific authorities in support

Res Ispa Loquiture in respect to fraud/unauthorized disclosure of medical info.

California case law does not appear to support applicability of Res Ispa Loquiture in respect to fraud/unauthorized disclosure of medical info.

Unless there specific authorities in support, inquired.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 15, 2024

Under California law, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is typically applied in cases involving negligence, where the injury or harm would not ordinarily occur without someone's negligence, and the defendant had exclusive control over the instrumentality causing the injury. However, its... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes, Health Care Law and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: For validation of authenticity of identity in this situation.

What Codes are relevant in order to validate authenticity of personal information of hospital service providers in this situation:

Data is maintained by public or local agencies,

but I request within the discovery process identity attributes, business records (i.e. authentic... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 15, 2024

In California, there are a few relevant codes and laws that pertain to validating the authenticity of personal information of hospital service providers, especially when the data is maintained by public or local agencies and requested within the discovery process. Here are the key relevant codes:... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Health Care Law for California on
Q: Sample motions language

Can you please provide link, sample, or phrasing that should be in motions:

- Motion for Court's order to Defendant hospital to disclose private information of hospital service providers, or providers of third party that hospital did business.

- Motion for camera review of privilege log.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 15, 2024

Here are some sample motion phrases and links to resources that may be helpful for the two motions you described under California law:

Motion for Court's Order to Defendant Hospital to Disclose Private Information of Service Providers:

Key Phrases:

- Plaintiff...
View More

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.