hospice fraud was actual,
I.E.
patient was referred to hospice from hospital with hospital admission diagnosis chronic terminal disease.
Track record of who exactly made a referral apparently does not exist.
Critical values of test on admission were communicated... View More 
What is chance in percentages, pros and cons of asking court for sanctions on defendant: issue and terminating?
Hospice fraud case, referral by hospital. Defendant hospital did not provide record of who exactly did referral. Fraud was based on fake or erroneous test results, communicated by... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 4, 2024
Under California law, compelling a definitive answer through sanctions can be an effective strategy in certain situations, but it is important to carefully consider the pros and cons before pursuing this approach.
Pros:
1. Obtaining crucial information: If the defendant has failed... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 3, 2024
I understand that you are looking for an attorney in California to assist with a question regarding your mother's medical treatment. Here are a few steps you can take to find a suitable attorney:
1. Contact the State Bar of California's Lawyer Referral Service. They can connect... View More
A few days before. Now she is stuck in a nursing home that we did not want. They refused to change her bandages for days and won’t give her any pain meds. She is confused now and weak, they are trying to get her to sign more papers. What can I do?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 3, 2024
I'm so sorry to hear about your mother's situation. That sounds incredibly stressful and concerning. Here are a few steps you can take:
1. Contact the nursing home administration immediately and express your concerns about your mother's care, especially the lack of bandage... View More
Doctor said when he opened him up he found cancer in his stomach but the head doctor said no cancer in his stomach and autopsy said same thing so the doctor cut to deep and he bleed out there alot more to it how they treated him
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 1, 2024
Based on the information you've provided, it sounds like you may have a potential medical malpractice case in California. However, more details would be needed to fully assess the viability of a lawsuit. A few key points regarding medical malpractice in California:
1. Standard of Care:... View More
Implants 6/2621,7/7/21 1 implant infected. Script for antibiotics and rinse went away but came back. Was on antibiotics for 6 months until surgeon exposed implants 1/18/22 and removed imbuments " NO MORE INFECTION" only had 4of the right size healing Post (I paid for 8). Lost my taste.... View More
answered on Apr 30, 2024
Your questions appear to be asking whether there is a dental malpractice claim against the dentist and/or his practice. Therefore, the following are recommendations:
Since you just started a full mouth implant process, and you have conferred with your dentist about your complaints, and... View More
What documents to look for at the law library in order to find out the workflow of legal process:
legal action from beginning to end, with permutations based on decision points.
Generic workflows exist?
If not - workflows specific to medical malpractice case, or California... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 29, 2024
When looking to understand the legal workflow for cases such as medical malpractice or California False Claims Act (CFCA) litigation, you'll find it beneficial to start by looking for specific resources in a law library. Key documents to search for include legal textbooks on tort law and civil... View More
Except of Williams vs Ross (2008) (distraction of evidence) what are similar authorities for imposing terminating or issue sanctions before a party disobeyed court order?
Specifically, referencing non-existent data.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 28, 2024
The key factors considered by the courts for terminating sanctions include the egregiousness of the misconduct, the impact on the integrity of the judicial process, and the prejudice to the opposing party.
Hospice fraud case.
Although issue and or evidence sanctions ordinarily will not be imposed until after an offending party has disobeyed a prior discovery order, a Court may impose such sanctions where the circumstances warrant them.
Upon what circumstances
evidence,... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 27, 2024
Under California law, evidence, issue, or terminating sanctions can be imposed even without a prior discovery order being disobeyed in certain circumstances where the discovery misconduct is particularly egregious. The key factors courts consider are:
1. The willfulness of the misconduct:... View More
This injury has made me suffer for years now. resulting in the illusion of me being on drugs. It was a medical emergency Dignity Health dropped the ball on. I have all medical docs in hand. I suffered five bone fractures and the destruction of my teeth as well. to the naked eye no one can tell it... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 26, 2024
I'm so sorry to hear about the medical injury you suffered and the devastating impact it has had on your life. What a terrible ordeal to go through, especially without being able to get the reconstructive surgery and dental work you need. Here are a few suggestions for potential next steps:... View More
Medical malpractice or healthcare fraud. If defendant boilerplate and without merit objected to disclose specific identities of wrongdoers;
what evidence or issue sanctions can be imposed, in addition to compelling response?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 26, 2024
Under California law, when a party fails to provide further responses or produce documents after being ordered to do so by the court, the court may impose various sanctions, including evidence and issue sanctions, in addition to compelling the response. Here are some potential sanctions that may be... View More
Given that hospice fraud is obvious, and that defendants meritless object discovery, what would be right time to file motion for summary judgement?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
In a case involving hospice fraud in California where the defendants are raising meritless objections to discovery, the timing of filing a motion for summary judgment depends on several factors. Here are some considerations:
1. Completion of discovery: Generally, it is advisable to file a... View More
At what point motion for summary judgement shall be filed In apparent hospice fraud case?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
In an apparent hospice fraud case, the timing of filing a motion for summary judgment depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the applicable rules of civil procedure. However, here are some general guidelines:
1. After the close of discovery: In most cases, it is advisable to... View More
If there are evidences that plaintiff has not had terminal disease at any times, and was fraudulently referred by hospital to hospice:
is more discovery needed? What else is needed for proof of fraud?
Terminal disease was recorded on admission to hospital, by doctor who referred... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
Under California law, if there is evidence that the plaintiff did not have a terminal disease at any time and was fraudulently referred by a hospital to hospice, additional discovery may be necessary to strengthen the case for fraud. Here are some key points to consider:
1. Medical records:... View More
Can plaintiff in Pro Per request monetary sanctions in Motion to Compel further discovery responses? What specifics?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
Yes, in California, a plaintiff who is representing themselves in pro per (or pro se) can request monetary sanctions when filing a Motion to Compel further discovery responses. Here are some specifics:
1. Legal basis: California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 2023.030 allows the court to... View More
Can first motion to compel further discovery responses by plaintiff request court an order rendering a judgement against defendant pursuant to CCP § 2023.030 (d) (4)?
CCP § 2023.030 (d) The court may impose a terminating sanction by one of the following orders: (4) An order rendering a... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
Under California law, CCP § 2023.030 (d) (4) allows the court to impose a terminating sanction by rendering a default judgment against a party for misuse of the discovery process. However, this is typically considered a severe sanction and is usually reserved for cases where there has been a... View More
Are all sub-components of Motion to Compel further discovery allowed to be compiled into one document, with title and footer Motion to compel further? (Notice and Motion, Memorandum, Separate statement, Declaration, Proposed Order).
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 24, 2024
In California, a Motion to Compel Further Discovery can typically include all the necessary sub-components in a single document. This is often referred to as a "Combined Motion." The California Rules of Court allow for this format to streamline the filing process.
A Combined... View More
Defense in response to discovery requests dumped thousands pages and misc files that do not include information requested. In consequent discovery responses defenses already references previously provided dump, as if it had requested data (it did not).
What plaintiff must do? Defense at... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 24, 2024
In a motion to compel further responses to discovery requests under California law, you should address the issue of the incomplete data dump by the defense as follows:
1. Specifically identify the discovery requests at issue and the deficiencies in the responses provided by the defense.... View More
Is Cal Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345(b) applicable when all special interrogatories were objected?
Is separate statement NOT required for motion to compel responses to SE if all interrogatories were objected?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 24, 2024
California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345(b) states:
"A separate statement is not required when no response has been provided to the request for discovery."
If all special interrogatories were objected to and no substantive responses were provided, then a separate statement... View More
Meaning: Responses to Special Interrogatories by attorney, that contain only objections - shall or not be signed? What is different between
CCP § 2030.250 (a) vs CCP § 2030.250 (c).
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024
Under California law, there is a difference between CCP § 2030.250 (a) and CCP § 2030.250 (c) regarding the signing of responses to special interrogatories that contain only objections.
CCP § 2030.250 (a) states:
"(a) The party to whom the interrogatories are directed shall... View More
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
