Get free answers to your Appeals / Appellate Law legal questions from lawyers in your area.
Please we are homeless had to claim tenant rights in motel we stayed for 127 days we have not got all the resources other than motel stay from welfare agency im ready to contact regional manager since everyone here is ignoring me please help

answered on Feb 8, 2025
It sounds like you're in a really tough situation, and it’s frustrating when the agencies that are supposed to help aren’t responding. Since you've already been staying at the motel for a long time, it’s important to document everything—keep records of your stay, any communication... View More

answered on Feb 8, 2025
Yes, "pro per" (also known as "pro se") means your husband is representing himself in the appeals process without a lawyer. This is a challenging path that requires careful attention to detail and understanding of legal procedures.
For appeals in California, you'll... View More
I couldn't submit my opening brief because I was admitted to a psychiatric unit and lost all my documents and my appeal brief

answered on Feb 7, 2025
When dealing with appeals in California, deadlines are strictly enforced. For many civil cases, you typically have 40 days from the date you file your notice of appeal or from when you receive your record on appeal to submit your opening brief. In criminal cases or other specific situations, the... View More
Me and my spouse got into angument at the motel 6 homeless shelter we were housed at in separate rooms, he ended up choking me. That night I went to Safeway and he was outside with two friends he tryed to attacke so I peppered sprayed him his friends called the police on me and had me arrested at... View More

answered on Feb 5, 2025
It sounds like you’ve been through a really tough and unfair situation. If your belongings were taken or thrown away without giving you a chance to retrieve them, that could be a violation of your rights. You may want to reach out to local legal aid services or a tenant advocacy group in Napa to... View More
the officers lying on the stand as prosecutions witnesses, the prosecutor and the judge saying he just got left holding the bag and is not the big fish, the co-defendant admitting that the bag was hers, the residue in a baggie and tiny mushroom found on him was thrown away by the officers searching... View More

answered on Feb 5, 2025
It sounds like your boyfriend is in a difficult situation, but there are several things he can do to challenge the charges and the way the case is being handled. First, it's important that his defense attorney looks into the credibility of the officers' testimony, especially if there are... View More
I'm facing due process violations in a TRO & divorce case, which stripped me of housing, parental rights & community property. The court granted sole custody despite my spouse stating she does not intend to keep me from my children. I oppose the divorce & seek mediation, but my... View More

answered on Jan 29, 2025
Challenging a TRO and asserting your estate claim requires a strategic approach. If the TRO violates due process, you can request a hearing to contest its terms and present evidence of its unfair impact. Since the court granted sole custody despite your spouse’s statements, you may file an appeal... View More
So I was pulled over, when asked for reason why I was pulled over cop stated because I had experied registrations but unfortunately I also had drugs on me, which I told the cop and he also wrote it on the ticket. So the ticket says expired registration and something about the drugs. Also I am... View More

answered on Jan 26, 2025
You can appeal or contest the ticket for the expired registration, but the process depends on the specific circumstances. If you believe the ticket for the registration was issued in error (for example, if your registration was current but not properly displayed), you can gather evidence, such as... View More
Amended complaint was filed after dismissal was entered against defendant AND after motion to set aside was denied to plaintiff. Amended complaint was filed before motion for reconsideration was heard by court, therefore judge was familiar with the allegations in the amended complaint (new facts).... View More

answered on Jan 24, 2025
The allegations in the amended complaint may not necessarily be referenced in the opening appeal brief unless they are directly relevant to the issue being appealed. The appeal is focused on the court's decision to deny the motion to set aside the dismissal, so the central question is whether... View More
In San Diego

answered on Jan 23, 2025
If you have an open criminal warrant and plan to attend an appeals court hearing for another case in San Diego, there's a significant chance you could be arrested upon your arrival. Courts often have processes in place to address outstanding warrants when someone appears for any legal... View More

answered on Jan 23, 2025
If you have an arrest warrant and appear in court for a civil case, there is a possibility you could be arrested. Warrants are typically flagged in court systems, and if law enforcement is notified of your presence, they may act on it. This depends on the nature of the warrant, the type of court... View More
With default judgement, we had sheriff scheduled to lock out tenant next day, 30 days after I delivered the writ of possession to the sheriff office. But judge granted the tenant another 40 days with deposit to the court last minutes. That means when 40 days up, i go to sheriff and sheriff backlog... View More

answered on Jan 21, 2025
You have a complex situation regarding the stay of execution in your eviction case. While you have the right to appeal the judge's decision, it's important to understand that appeals courts generally defer to lower court judgments on discretionary matters like stays of execution.... View More
Referencing self and opposing party in opening brief.
Self should be appellant or defendant?

answered on Jan 20, 2025
In your opening brief, you should refer to yourself as "Appellant" if you're appealing a lower court's decision, or "Defendant-Appellant" if you were the defendant in the original case and are now appealing. This maintains formal consistency throughout your legal... View More
Is it responsibility of litigant to instruct licensed server of process which form must be used for proof of service? Which law/rule defines that?
If the answer
is "yes" - what is probability percentage that wrong form of proof of service would be basis to dismiss appeal... View More

answered on Jan 18, 2025
The responsibility for using the correct proof of service form typically falls on the party serving the documents, as outlined in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 417.10 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.150. The server should understand which form to use based on the type of service... View More
Plaintiff was intentionally misinformed during hospitalization that attending doctor did not lead discharge arrangements.
Discharge arrangements led to damages. During legal case plaintiff decided to dismiss case against doctor without propounding discovery on defendant doctor. Plaintiff... View More

answered on Jan 18, 2025
This situation involves a mistake of fact, not a mistake of law. The key distinction lies in what the plaintiff was unaware of - specifically, the doctor's direct involvement in discharge arrangements and false medical records.
The error centers around factual circumstances that were... View More
Can additional evidences that were not presented at trial court be presented to court of appeal? Additional evidences are in direct relevance to fact alleged and evidences presented to trial court

answered on Jan 18, 2025
In California, the general rule is that you cannot present new evidence on appeal that wasn't first introduced at the trial court level. The appellate court's role is to review the trial court's decisions based on the record that existed when those decisions were made.
There... View More
Wouldn't it be a fault of a legally sophisticated party that informal intents were not formalized and filed with court?
Is it demonstrated intent to deceive that consequently occurred?

answered on Jan 17, 2025
In California law, both parties generally share responsibility for formalizing informal agreements, regardless of their legal sophistication. However, courts often scrutinize situations where a more knowledgeable party may have taken advantage of someone with less legal experience.
The... View More
Should attachment #4b to APP-003 be filed with court as separate document or scanned together with APP-003 and POS?
Is stamping "Received" required for Attachment ?

answered on Jan 17, 2025
When filing the APP-003 Notice Designating Record on Appeal in California courts, you should scan and file Attachment 4b together with the main APP-003 form and Proof of Service as one complete document. This creates a cohesive filing package that helps court clerks process your documents... View More
informal agreement cannot be in any nightmare misconstrued as deliberate choice.
What could be other ideas to allege that inadvertent error was not such?

answered on Jan 17, 2025
Let me share some insights about proving inadvertent errors versus deliberate choices. The key lies in establishing patterns of behavior and documented evidence that support your position.
Consider gathering previous examples where you've demonstrated careful attention to detail and... View More
How exactly entering into an informal agreement with execution terms consequently defined (not in advance, i. e. there was preliminary agreement that was further clarified - within a week) would NOT qualify as inadvertent? Given that person who entered into this agreement provided extraordinary... View More

answered on Jan 17, 2025
Let me help you understand this situation better. An inadvertent agreement typically involves accidental or unintentional actions, which doesn't seem to be your case at all.
When you deliberately entered into an informal agreement, even though the execution terms were defined later,... View More
How from legal prospective plaintiff's dismissal of the case based on informal promise of doctor to amend records could be misrepresented as "not inadvertent" mistake? Plaintiff acted in good faith, after medical evidences were presented to doctor. Doctor committed fraud, not plaintiff.

answered on Jan 16, 2025
From a legal standpoint in California, your dismissal based on the doctor's informal promise could be challenged as "not inadvertent" if there was no formal, written agreement documenting the doctor's commitment to amend the records. Courts typically require clear documentation... View More
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.