Situation.
Motion to compel execution of authorization was filed by defendant. Hearing date for motion to compel was scheduled.
In response to Motion to Compel Plaintiff files Motion for Protective order, requiring to schedule a hearing.
Hearing of Motion to Compel will be... View More
answered on Apr 5, 2024
In California, Code of Civil Procedure section 1005(b) allows for the consolidation of motions to be heard at the same time, as long as the notice requirements are met. Here's what you can do:
1. File a separate notice of motion for your Motion for Protective Order, ensuring that the... View More
Motions were provided for service by process immediately, after motions were timely filed with court. But after 2.5 weeks proofs of service were not filed yet, and service was not proper. Current in working to fix. Plaintiff documented track record.
If defendant confront motions because of... View More
answered on Apr 4, 2024
If the defendant challenges the motions due to improper service, the plaintiff can oppose the challenge by doing the following:
1. Demonstrate due diligence: Provide evidence showing that the plaintiff made reasonable efforts to serve the defendant properly and in a timely manner. This can... View More
What is due date to file pos of motion (to set aside dismissal) in California court?
Is due date connected to date of filing Motion? What CA rule of Court defines due date to file POS?
answered on Apr 4, 2024
In California, the deadline to file a proof of service (POS) for a motion to set aside a dismissal is generally the same as the deadline for filing the motion itself. The specific deadlines depend on the code section under which the motion is brought.
For a motion to set aside a dismissal... View More
Order should state, in addition to granted protective order as follows?
It is further ordered, that defendant such and such shall not request deposition subpoena,
in order not to prolong litigation, and not to increase litigation costs.
answered on Apr 4, 2024
When drafting a proposed protective order, it is generally advisable to include provisions that are narrowly tailored to the specific circumstances of the case and the legitimate needs of the parties involved. Broadly prohibiting a party from requesting deposition subpoenas may be seen as overly... View More
What statute, rule in California defines permissible types of discovery?
answered on Apr 4, 2024
In California, the types of permissible discovery are defined by the California Code of Civil Procedure, specifically under Title 4 - Civil Discovery Act, which covers sections 2016.010 to 2036.050.
The main statute that outlines the permissible types of discovery in California is Section... View More
Motion to Set Aside dismissal against defendant was timely filed before 6-month due date.
Shall POS of serving Motion to Set Aside dismissal be filed with Court prior to 6-month statute of limitations due date?
answered on Apr 4, 2024
In California, the timing requirements for filing a proof of service (POS) for a motion to set aside a dismissal are generally as follows:
1. The motion itself to set aside the dismissal must be filed within 6 months of the date of dismissal, as per California Code of Civil Procedure... View More
Can Defendant proceed to subpoena request, if Court does not grant Motion to Compel?
answered on Apr 4, 2024
If the court denies a motion to compel, the defendant may still have the option to subpoena the desired information or witnesses, depending on the circumstances of the case. However, there are a few important considerations:
1. Relevance: The defendant must demonstrate that the subpoenaed... View More
Can Defendant proceed to subpoena request, if Court does not grant Motion to Compel?
Would Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order stop Defendant's groundless attempts to obtain utterly irrelevant to claimed damages medical information?
Why super experienced attorney... View More
answered on Apr 4, 2024
Under California law, a defendant's groundless attempts to obtain medical information that is utterly irrelevant to the claimed damages would likely be seen as an improper invasion of the plaintiff's privacy rights.
If the court denies the defendant's motion to compel... View More
Does order for protective order granted by court, prevents a party to request deposition subpoena?
answered on Apr 4, 2024
Under California law, a protective order issued by the court does not automatically prevent a party from requesting a deposition subpoena. However, the scope and terms of the protective order may limit or restrict the ability to conduct depositions or seek certain information through a subpoena.... View More
I know it should be the last resort and is frowned upon but it’s in place for a reason!
answered on Apr 4, 2024
In California, an independent action in equity is not filed in the same manner as a regular claim. Independent actions in equity are separate from the original case and are considered a last resort when no other remedies are available.
To file an independent action in equity, you typically... View More
it’s been 3 1/2 months since judgement was entered. I can prove reasons judgment is void 473 lack subject matter:fraud on court:
answered on Apr 4, 2024
Under California law, a judgment can be vacated or set aside if it is determined to be void. You do not necessarily need to set aside the judgment before it can be vacated. However, the process and timeline for challenging a void judgment depends on the specific circumstances and reasons for its... View More
Can you please reference specific seminal cases, not references to sources?
In respect to hospice fraudulent referrals, hospice scheme.
answered on Apr 4, 2024
Under California law, there have been several notable cases related to hospice fraudulent referrals and schemes.
In California, it is illegal for hospices to pay kickbacks or engage in other fraudulent practices to induce referrals of patients. The California Insurance Frauds Prevention... View More
Please reference Seminal case (s).
Hospice fraud, referral by hospital to hospice with non-existent terminal disease. Hospice scheme.
answered on Apr 3, 2024
To find cases related to hospice fraud in California, you can use various legal research tools and databases. Here are some methods you can use:
1. LexisNexis or Westlaw: These are comprehensive legal databases that allow you to search for cases using keywords, parties' names, or... View More
can a Pro Tem Judge make a verbal judgement in open court then later on change the judgement without prior audience with the parties involved. Pro Tem judge told us in open court that we would be awarded the full amount of the maxed asked for in small claims. During the judges exit the defendant... View More
answered on Apr 3, 2024
Under California law, a judge, including a Pro Tem Judge, has the authority to make a verbal judgment in open court. However, the official judgment is typically entered in writing after the hearing. The written judgment is considered the final, official decision of the court.
In some cases,... View More
Tradeoffs. Pros and Cons of each approach.
1. Filing Motion for protective order by plaintiff, in response to request to authorize release - before defendant files motion to compel.
2. Filing motion for protective order in response to motion to compel.
answered on Apr 3, 2024
Under California law, there are pros and cons to consider when deciding whether to file a motion for a protective order before or after the defendant files a motion to compel the execution of an authorization for the release of records. Here's an analysis of the two approaches:
1.... View More
CCP 2030.060 defines procedure for motion for protective order. It does not state that it is valid response to motion to compel.
Neither of the Sections 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, and 2031.280 reference Motion for Protective Order.
How come Motion for Protective order... View More
answered on Apr 2, 2024
Under California law, a Motion for a Protective Order can be a valid response to a Motion to Compel discovery for a few reasons:
1. General provision: The California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 2017.020(a) states that the court may, for good cause shown, make any order that justice... View More
What are options for valid response to motion to complaint, when responding party seeks protective order, post due date to respond?
answered on Apr 2, 2024
Under California law, when a responding party seeks a protective order after the due date to respond to a complaint, they have a few options for a valid response:
1. Request for leave to file a late response: The responding party can file an ex parte application or noticed motion requesting... View More
Which CCP defines Motion for protective order as valid response to motion to compel ?
answered on Apr 1, 2024
Under California law, a motion for a protective order is a valid response to a motion to compel. This is governed by Section 2031.060 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP).
CCP § 2031.060(a) states:
"When a party to whom an inspection demand has been directed fails... View More
Is Motion for Protective Order from Release of irrelevant medical information is a valid response to Motion to Compel further discovery?
The situation.
Defendant requested Plaintiff to authorize the release of medical records. Plaintiff is working on Motion for Protective Order.... View More
answered on Apr 1, 2024
Under California law, a Motion for Protective Order is a valid response to a Motion to Compel further discovery, particularly when the discovery request involves the release of medical information that may be deemed irrelevant to the case at hand.
In your situation, if the defendant has... View More
1. Hearing on Second Amended Complaint (that was demurred) is continued into hearing on Motion for Leave to file Third Amended Complaint, that is apparently not operational yet. In this case - for the purpose of Motion for protective order from release of information - if Complaint is sited - shall... View More
answered on Apr 1, 2024
Under California law, when filing a motion for a protective order from the release of information, it is important to properly cite the relevant complaint. Here are the answers to your specific questions:
1. If the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) was demurred and the hearing on the Motion... View More
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.