Get free answers to your Constitutional Law legal questions from lawyers in your area.
After being told she was on a roster with my name I called the police station. They said they'd taken care of it but I lost my job and it's still on there. I can't get another job with fingerprinted backgrounds. This has kept me from any good work.
answered on Aug 31, 2024
It sounds like you're dealing with a very difficult situation. First, you should consider contacting the police department again to ensure they have correctly updated your records and that your name has been cleared from any false charges. If the police fail to resolve the issue, you may need... View More
I went by ambulance to the hospital after a police officer slammed into the wall. Not to mention the unlawful arrest which I was found not guilty. I think I should be compensated for the dehumanizing, public embarrassment, losing my job after being incarcerated for a week, medical bills I owe for... View More
answered on Aug 31, 2024
In Illinois, the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit related to police brutality, unlawful arrest, and similar claims typically falls under the category of personal injury. You generally have two years from the date of the incident to file a lawsuit. However, if the case involves a... View More
DCFS caseworker xx did not follow, DCFS's procedure and protocol on the
removal of xx on 08.11.2021.
Thus, xx had no legal grounds to take the child. The police also stated in their
reports that it was determined that DCFS would be taking the child into their custody.... View More
answered on Aug 31, 2024
It sounds like you may have grounds for a restitution claim based on the information you provided. If the DCFS caseworker did not follow the required procedures and protocols, and if there was no imminent danger justifying the removal of your child without a warrant, this could be a violation of... View More
What can a person do that's been arrested on a federal indictment but had already been diagnosed with cancer and started radiation treatments. They have denied bond so the person is currently being held in jail and is not able to continue with the radiation treatments. There has to be... View More
answered on Jul 21, 2024
If you are facing a federal indictment and have been diagnosed with cancer, it's important to act quickly to protect your health. First, communicate your medical condition to your attorney immediately. They can file a motion with the court for a temporary release or alternative detention... View More
why is it that united states citizens belonging to this democracy tried to publish fake pictures of lee harvey oswald that have been altered or changed & say they was orginal unless people within the states who subverted us killed jfk & are misleading the country acting like it's law... View More
answered on Jun 17, 2024
Your question might be objected to if it's seen as argumentative or speculative. To phrase it in a way that is less likely to be objected to, focus on specific concerns and avoid making broad accusations.
Consider rephrasing your question like this:
"Why have there been... View More
war enslavement invasion murder & looting in the political theater and they are to secure liberty for united states citizens not enslave them they kick in our homes & take our property which no matter what it is as long as it doesn't have to do with a murder or anything serious like a... View More
answered on Jun 1, 2024
Arguing that the government is levying war against its own citizens is a serious accusation that involves a deep understanding of constitutional law and the definition of acts of war. While you feel that actions like invasion of privacy, unlawful searches, and property seizures are akin to acts of... View More
but there's tons of evidence of the fact with 2 commanders declaring such 1 for us & drugs the other being corrupt the one being for drugs got killed imagine that right then the continuous invasion of privacy like how they invaded my home 1 day & when asked for the warrant they said... View More
answered on Jun 1, 2024
It sounds like you're experiencing a lot of frustration and confusion about your rights and the actions of law enforcement. It’s important to understand that law enforcement must follow certain legal procedures, including obtaining warrants for searches, which are supposed to be signed by a... View More
& with all the evidence traitors that commit treason of levying a war against united states & allowance of a subversion to take place of our government & nation i've got gorge Washington saying the party sprit would lead to a subversion i've got jfk telling us we are at a war... View More
answered on May 1, 2024
It sounds like you're feeling really overwhelmed and frustrated with a range of issues concerning government actions and their impact on liberty. It's understandable to be concerned about these matters, especially when historical and current events seem to show a pattern of behavior that... View More
war is bad for our nations security the enemy has advaced they have taken over this country in the form of dea & democracy which we are guaranteed a republican form of government & we ain't 2nd 14th amendment no law shall be created that deprives a us citizen their privilege which is... View More
answered on Apr 16, 2024
I understand that you feel very strongly about these issues and want to defend your views, but I have some concerns about the approach you're describing. While you have every right to present your defense as you see fit, I would advise carefully considering the potential consequences and... View More
in the privacy of my home when i argue that it is treason & i am free & that the warrant was very unreasonable as it is my right as a free citizen of the united states to have non stolen guns & to have drugs as long as i didn't take another's liberty in any manner & as a... View More
answered on Apr 14, 2024
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, but if law enforcement obtained a valid search warrant by demonstrating probable cause to a judge, they are legally allowed to search your home and seize contraband like drugs and illegal weapons. Calling this... View More
& where it says for the government is to secure liberty Arrasmith its unconstitutional the courts think they are liberating the u.s. but you clearly are in agreement that they are enslaving the u.s. which is an act of war & so is invading,looting & murder it is treason it's against... View More
answered on Apr 3, 2024
The U.S. Constitution remains the supreme law of the land. While people may have differing opinions on how it should be interpreted and applied, advocating for the removal of key sections like the Preamble's mention of securing the blessings of liberty goes against the foundational principles... View More
answered on Apr 3, 2024
Yes, United States citizens are legally free and the 13th Amendment expressly prohibits slavery or indentured servitude. Part of being a free people is the freedom to surrender portions of our liberty for the common good or for our own good. As a constitutional republic, individual freedom in the... View More
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity
& the militia is to make sure it is a free state with the 14th amendment that says no law shall be created that deprives a united states citizen of its privilege within the theory of liberty or concept the only act that can be criminal... View More
answered on Mar 31, 2024
The Constitution of the United States indeed enshrines the preservation of liberty as a core principle, aiming to secure the "Blessings of Liberty" for both current and future generations. This commitment to freedom is a cornerstone of American democracy, guiding the governance and legal... View More
did the constitution & the bill of rights all are designed for the duel 2nd amendment to congress providing common defense & liberty that was a private right of ours when we was a free people now days we don't or can't duel because why we are not free & don't have no... View More
answered on Mar 30, 2024
You raise some interesting points about the historical context and philosophical underpinnings of liberty and rights. Let me try to address a few key aspects:
The ideas of John Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers like Montesquieu and Rousseau were highly influential on the U.S. Founders.... View More
ague our liberty because if they did they might win more cases i don't think you lawyers know truthfully what liberty is so in turn how do they know law
answered on Feb 22, 2024
I would respectfully disagree with the premise that lawyers do not argue for liberty or understand what it truly entails. Defense attorneys in particular carry a tremendous responsibility to advocate for the rights and liberties of their clients against the power of the state.
When... View More
answered on Nov 12, 2023
In Missouri, as in all of the United States, due process refers to the legal principle that the government must respect all of a person's legal rights, rather than just some or most of those legal rights. While the creation of laws is part of the broader legislative process, due process... View More
Didn't receive a summons in the mail at all and according to judgment I have 10 days from the 3rd to move. Does that include weekend or holidays
answered on Nov 12, 2023
In Missouri, when a judgment specifies a period like 10 days to take action, it typically includes weekends and holidays, unless the court order or applicable law specifically states otherwise. This means that in your case, the 10-day period from the 3rd would include weekends and Veterans Day.... View More
it isn't as No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States according to the 14th Amendment & that the controlled substance act gets its constitutional power from the commerce clause which states congress is to have... View More
answered on Nov 8, 2023
The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) is indeed a federal law, and its enforcement is not solely restricted to public commerce. The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the Commerce Clause to allow Congress to regulate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. In cases such as... View More
WHEN LOOKING FOR A LAWYER DO THEY NEED TO COME FROM THE STATE THE CLIENT RESIDES IN OR IS SUING IN?
answered on Nov 6, 2023
This is a great question. For many areas of law it is best to hire an attorney in the state where you have your dispute or other legal issue. Many areas of law like family law and contracts can vary from state to state. If you are getting divorced, you want a divorce attorney who knows the laws... View More
Question about MO court rule 75.01 and 74.05. Had a case and there was a default judgement. The respondent didn't respond at all. Within 30 days after judgment, they respond. I claimed it was a default judgement and controlled by 74.05. Judge says 75.01 applies since within 30 days and not... View More
answered on Nov 5, 2023
In Missouri, Rule 74.05 pertains to setting aside a default judgment, which can be invoked when a party has failed to appear or respond to a lawsuit. However, if a party responds within 30 days of the judgment, as stated in Rule 75.01, the court may have discretion to consider it as a motion for a... View More
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.