Yes, just be very careful to follow the law as to notice requirements, and if they do not leave, I strongly suggest at least consulting with a landlord-tenant attorney if you have to file with the court.

Technically yes, but I personally would caution against it if the employer was my client as it could be seen as retaliation/discrimination for filing the claim.

Yes it is: https://www.oregon.gov/boli/TA/pages/t_faq_drugtesting.aspx

The issue is a bit in flux. An Oregon Supreme Court decision a few years ago involving Mt. Hood Meadows said they are not, but I think it is more nuanced than that. Basically, you cannot sign away negligence, so hard to know if that was your issue since you say faulty equipment.

What I... View More

Generally speaking 90 days: https://www.osbar.org/public/legalinfo/1250_RentIncreases.htm

I doubt the bee has insurance or you would be able to track the bee down to sue.

Otherwise, you would have to show it was someone's fault you were stung, such as they threw the beehive at you.

No, there is no special rule for if there is a no cause eviction. But, make sure they do follow the laws as to timing and documentation: see ORS 90.300

First, this would be a trademark issue, and secondly, I think there would be likelihood of confusion between the two marks.

Yes, but you can make an argument to reduce the amount and see if that gets a jury to reduce the award.

Statutory damages are $750 on the low end, though a judge could lower it to $200. This assumes the work is registered, and they would also be entitled to attorneys fees and costs, which could be substantially more than the $750 that is likely.

As to a commercial website, do you make money... View More

You can't, you have to be 14: http://www.oregon.gov/BOLI/WHD/CLU/Pages/W_CLU_Taminors.aspx

There are a few exceptions, but none would apply to what you describe.

Depends on what you mean by instigated and how the fight turned out. If you started the fight in that you hit first, the other person has a right to defend themselves.

They are not connected. You can file and pursue both.

You could certainly try, but given they are bankrupt it may be a pointless effort since they have no money.

Depends on how he hurt his back. Turn it over to your homeowners insurance and let them handle it.

No, there is no law in regards to suspensions.

Honestly, it would not matter, to the extent there would be different forms. A release would be a release. The accident occurred in Oregon, which means that is really the proper forum.

Without searching, I would say that is almost guaranteed that it is. As to use, there are some uses that would be allowed under fair use.

Yes, they would have to pay for that cost:

" (2) The employer shall pay any reasonable costs for providing medical verification or certification required under this section, including lost wages, that are not paid under a health benefit plan in which the employee is enrolled." ORS 653.626

Renters insurance should cover a claim made against you for such, in that they should defend you. As to the merits f such a claim, I would posit it would likely not be a successful case.