Hearsay is a statement made about what someone said to a testifying witness. If your husband were to tell the court that although he was blind, you told him you had a knife and that you were going to attack him with it, there is an exception to the hearsay rule because it would be something you... View More

Check to see whether her bankruptcy case was dismissed or whether her debts were discharged. Check at https://pacer.login.uscourts.gov/csologin/login.jsf

If your claim was listed, and if her debts were discharged, no, you can't sue her. Her statements that "she felt ethically... View More

The question raises several interesting points:

1. What were the circumstances involving an attorney being appointed to represent you in a bankruptcy case? Normally you would retain a bankruptcy attorney, not have one "appointed" to represent you.

2. You say the... View More

You realized that you were only buying the front house but didn't know that that house was in violation? Review your paperwork to see if the seller warranted the property to not be in violation of code. You also may have a viable claim against your realtor.

No, it is not unethical to so refuse. Any professional may refuse to treat a particular patient or (for other professionals) work for a specific client. It's not a matter of urgency: the patient won't die is she doesn't see the gynecologist in the period between the referral and... View More

You indicated that each of you "dismissed" the other spouse. A party to a case cannot dismiss a case filed by another party. Do you mean that the respective courts dismissed both cases? If so, when a motion to dismiss was filed, you should have responded that you "retained [y]our... View More

You need to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. It should be supported by an affidavit (written statement under oath and signed by you and the notary before whom you swore under oath) setting forth the genuine issues of material fact which you believe would be issues to prevent... View More

The death of the mortgagee doesn't really make any difference to the holder of the mortgage. As long as the payments are made on time, there should be no problem. If the mortgage note is not paid on time, the holder of the mortgage can foreclose.

There is in general no prohibition against either if you going to the gun shop, either together or separately. It is unclear what difference you suspect it might make that he is your child or that you don't reside together. One could go shopping with a complete stranger; again, it makes no... View More

Generally, an "estate attorney" represents the personal representative. So, if the PR has been removed, the attorney's client is no longer a party to the case, assuming the former PR is not also an heir. If that assumption is incorrect, the attorney would still represent the former PR.

No. A civil case (when one person sues another person) generally requires money damages. It doesn't appear that you have suffered any damages.

And such a fact scenario doesn't suggest that a crime has been committed either, assuming you took your own shirt off.

Contact your liability insurance carrier and advise them of the situation. They probably have the obligation to retain an attorney to defend you, so when they do so your attorney should address the issue.

Vald service of process doesn't depend on whether the person the process server hands the summons to agrees to accept it. If the process server gave the summons to the person who answered the door, and the defendant's residence, the defendant has been served. You shouldn't be asked... View More

That is what liability insurance companies are in business for: protect insured parties from liability for their negligent acts. It did that when it paid you a settlement. In return, you, no doubt, released the insured from liability for the accident. And the insurance company didn't... View More

Liability on the part of you or the company does not depend on whether or not the vehicle was insured. If, as you say, you didn't cause the accident, you would not be civilly liable. But causation and damages would be something for the plaintiff to prove by a preponderance of the evidence.... View More

No. You don't need to attend the lack of prosecution (LOP) hearing. The chances are that a default judgment will be entered against you unless you contact the plaintiff and settle the case by the August status hearing.

You don't HAVE to make payments at all. But since the dismissal was without prejudice, the plaintiff may, if it chooses, re-file the case and get a judgment. If so, it could attempt to collect by garnishment and by other means.

A civil lawsuit normally requires money damages. Unless there is a statute imposing punitive damages, such a suit for using your car would bring you pennies, at least, so it probably wouldn't be worth your time and expense. Also, the body shop might well contend that it was necessary to see... View More

It appears that you would have what is called an easement by implication or by necessity. So no, the person who sold you your land doesn't have the right to refuse access and you could probably bring a successful lawsuit to establish your right to access your property.

No, it is unlikely that you could be held liable for having him on your insurance. Liability normally results from negligent action on the part of a driver, not co-insured such as you would be.