My roommate has filed a lawsuit against me. She claims that I punched her 20 times very hard and is using a back covered in pimples as evidence. What actions should I take? Also, where can I find an expert witness to testify that punches cannot result in pimples in San Jose, CA?
What is chance in percentages, pros and cons of asking court for sanctions on defendant: issue and terminating?
Hospice fraud case, referral by hospital. Defendant hospital did not provide record of who exactly did referral. Fraud was based on fake or erroneous test results, communicated by... View More 
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 4, 2024
Under California law, compelling a definitive answer through sanctions can be an effective strategy in certain situations, but it is important to carefully consider the pros and cons before pursuing this approach.
Pros:
1. Obtaining crucial information: If the defendant has failed... View More
answered on May 2, 2024
If the police can track down the assaulters, you can sue them and make a claim against their parents, if minors, and potentially the homeowner's insurance.
There may be others liable, such as the school, if they took actions or failed to take actions that would be considered... View More
answered on Apr 30, 2024
Health care providers, and nearly everyone cannot charge on a percentage basis, except attorneys.
After a case settles, the health care providers might be asked to reduce the amount they are owed. It is not unusual for all the health care providers bills, after negotiation, be 1/3 of the... View More
This is not a request for legal advice but just clarification of how this type of lawsuit works.
The defendants are the main property owner (shopping center) but apparently also 3 huge commercial real estate investment firms that according to google helped finance this property for the main... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 29, 2024
In California, when multiple defendants are named in a personal injury (PI) case, such as your situation with the property owner and the investment firms, it's common for these defendants to be represented either individually by separate legal teams or collectively by one team, depending on... View More
Hospice fraud case.
Although issue and or evidence sanctions ordinarily will not be imposed until after an offending party has disobeyed a prior discovery order, a Court may impose such sanctions where the circumstances warrant them.
Upon what circumstances
evidence,... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 27, 2024
Under California law, evidence, issue, or terminating sanctions can be imposed even without a prior discovery order being disobeyed in certain circumstances where the discovery misconduct is particularly egregious. The key factors courts consider are:
1. The willfulness of the misconduct:... View More
I've filed a lawsuit at the LA Superior Court against my employer, and 1-100 does. I am serving Rogs and RFAs. What is the most efficient way to use them without hitting the 35-question limit? Also, does the 35-question limit include both Rogs and RFAs combined, or is it for each one of them?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 27, 2024
In California, the limits for written discovery in unlimited civil cases are as follows:
1. Form Interrogatories (FI): No limit on the number of Form Interrogatories you can ask.
2. Special Interrogatories (SI): You are limited to 35 specially prepared interrogatories per party,... View More
With injury to someone the lighter was at fault can I hold the maker of the lighter responsible
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 26, 2024
In a product liability case like this, there are a few key factors to consider under California law:
1. Defective design or manufacturing: You would need to show that the lighter was defectively designed or manufactured in a way that allowed it to stay lit even when the button was released... View More
If there are evidences that plaintiff has not had terminal disease at any times, and was fraudulently referred by hospital to hospice:
is more discovery needed? What else is needed for proof of fraud?
Terminal disease was recorded on admission to hospital, by doctor who referred... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
Under California law, if there is evidence that the plaintiff did not have a terminal disease at any time and was fraudulently referred by a hospital to hospice, additional discovery may be necessary to strengthen the case for fraud. Here are some key points to consider:
1. Medical records:... View More
Can plaintiff in Pro Per request monetary sanctions in Motion to Compel further discovery responses? What specifics?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
Yes, in California, a plaintiff who is representing themselves in pro per (or pro se) can request monetary sanctions when filing a Motion to Compel further discovery responses. Here are some specifics:
1. Legal basis: California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 2023.030 allows the court to... View More
Can first motion to compel further discovery responses by plaintiff request court an order rendering a judgement against defendant pursuant to CCP § 2023.030 (d) (4)?
CCP § 2023.030 (d) The court may impose a terminating sanction by one of the following orders: (4) An order rendering a... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024
Under California law, CCP § 2023.030 (d) (4) allows the court to impose a terminating sanction by rendering a default judgment against a party for misuse of the discovery process. However, this is typically considered a severe sanction and is usually reserved for cases where there has been a... View More
Defense in response to discovery requests dumped thousands pages and misc files that do not include information requested. In consequent discovery responses defenses already references previously provided dump, as if it had requested data (it did not).
What plaintiff must do? Defense at... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 24, 2024
In a motion to compel further responses to discovery requests under California law, you should address the issue of the incomplete data dump by the defense as follows:
1. Specifically identify the discovery requests at issue and the deficiencies in the responses provided by the defense.... View More
Is the Separate Statement of Items in Dispute required for Motion to Compel further responses to special interrogatories? (unless specific items can be included in the Points and Authorities section of the Motion).
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024
Yes, under California law, a Separate Statement is generally required when filing a Motion to Compel further responses to special interrogatories, per California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 2030.300(b). The statute states:
"A motion to compel further response to an interrogatory... View More
I found out that this guy I met a few times has cancer. We're not friends. Just met him a few times. I am not a doctor or a medical professional but I told him to try this supplement and that was the end of the conversation.
I did not say that this supplement was going to cure cancer... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024
In general, it is unlikely that you would be held legally responsible for simply suggesting a supplement to someone with cancer, especially if you did not make any false claims or promise a cure. However, there are a few factors to consider:
1. You did not claim to be a medical professional... View More
The person behind this is a ex secret service agent and FBI agent from Redding and Roseville
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024
I'm sorry to hear about your distressing experiences. It sounds like you're going through a very tough time. However, it's important to know that the technologies and scenarios you're describing, like remote neurological monitoring and "V2K voice to skull," are not... View More
Fraudulent certification for admission to hospice was recorded on the day of admission to hospice, by a physician unknown to the patient (but probably indeed affiliated with hospice).
Hospice certification was recorded based on non-existent terminal disease, which was recorded on admission... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024
Under California law, a hospital discharge summary containing a non-existent or false admission diagnosis that is used as the basis for hospice certification and to receive government benefits could potentially be considered a false claim.
The California False Claims Act (CFCA) prohibits... View More
I'm disabled, have PTSD and panic disorder. This stems from his client!
During court the judge asked us to exchange paperwork outside the courtroom at the standing tables. He was frustrated and we agreed to be done. Both closed up our belongings and I started off. He caught up to me... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 19, 2024
Based on your description, the behavior of your husband's lawyer appears to be unprofessional and potentially unethical. While it may not be strictly illegal, it could be a violation of the lawyer's professional responsibilities and the rules of conduct for attorneys in California.... View More
Kaiser does not provide the treatment I now need and will not cover the fees for the service. Do I have a case against them?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 19, 2024
Based on the information you provided, you may potentially have a case against Kaiser Permanente for medical malpractice or breach of contract. However, the viability of your case depends on several factors, such as:
1. The nature and severity of your misdiagnosis
2. The impact of... View More
For hospice fraud by Hospice as General stock corporation (means CEO).
Hospice as corporation bears vicarious liability for independent contractors, as applicable.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 18, 2024
In California, a hospice operating as a general stock corporation can be held vicariously liable for the actions of its independent contractors in certain circumstances, particularly when those actions involve fraud. Here's a more detailed explanation:
1. Vicarious liability: This... View More
Major renovations in progress in my building where we have hundreds of units. I work at home. The noise has been deafening and I have lost wages and work as a result. Now they have begun removing the ceilings in the common interior hallways dues to asbestos. Tenants still residing in their... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 18, 2024
Under California law, landlords are required to follow strict regulations when it comes to asbestos removal to ensure the safety of tenants. Here are some key points:
1. Proper notification: The landlord must provide written notice to all tenants about the asbestos removal project,... View More
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
