Maryland Employment Law Questions & Answers
Q: My employer in Montgomery County md is refusing to put in my accrued sick pay while Im on maternity leave. What can I do
Joseph D. Allen's answer
Maryland employers (that have at least 15 employees) are required to offer only unpaid maternity leave, under the Parental Leave Act. However, under the Maryland Flexible Leave Act, those employers must allow employees on unpaid leave to care for a newborn to elect to use their earned/accrued PTO instead of unpaid leave. You could either inform your employer of that law and ask them to reconsider, file a complaint with the DLLR, or hire an attorney (who may or may not take your case on...
Maryland employers (that have at least 15 employees) are required to offer only unpaid maternity leave, under the Parental Leave Act. However, under the Maryland Flexible Leave Act, those employers must allow employees on unpaid leave to care for a newborn to elect to use their earned/accrued PTO instead of unpaid leave. You could either inform your employer of that law and ask them to reconsider, file a complaint with the DLLR, or hire an attorney (who may or may not take your case on...
Q: can an employer change & reduce salary to hourly & say it was based on 45 hours per week if the pay stub clearly say 40?
Joseph D. Allen's answer
As long as the employer gives at least a pay period advance notice to employee of a reduction in pay, they are not violating any laws in MD. However, your question raises the issue of whether you were appropriately classified as exempt in the first place- if your job duties have truly remained the same, and you are now being called non-exempt.
A salary can be based on a 45 hour (or longer) workweek. But if you were in fact working more than 40 hours a week, and your job duties (and...
As long as the employer gives at least a pay period advance notice to employee of a reduction in pay, they are not violating any laws in MD. However, your question raises the issue of whether you were appropriately classified as exempt in the first place- if your job duties have truly remained the same, and you are now being called non-exempt.
A salary can be based on a 45 hour (or longer) workweek. But if you were in fact working more than 40 hours a week, and your job duties (and...
Q: Maryland sick/safe law, can you be forceto use your accrued PTO?
Joseph D. Allen's answer
As long as the employer's overall PTO policy provides the minimum sick/safe leave, they can require the employee to use earned PTO. However, if the employer does not set aside leave that can only be used for sick/safe purposes, the DLLR guidance states that it "strongly encourages such employers to advise employees that sick and safe leave is covered by the existing PTO the employer provides and that any additional sick and safe leave will not be provided." But based on your question, it...
As long as the employer's overall PTO policy provides the minimum sick/safe leave, they can require the employee to use earned PTO. However, if the employer does not set aside leave that can only be used for sick/safe purposes, the DLLR guidance states that it "strongly encourages such employers to advise employees that sick and safe leave is covered by the existing PTO the employer provides and that any additional sick and safe leave will not be provided." But based on your question, it...
Q: non exempt W2 salaried in Maryland . Company website shows I work 5/40hrs but I work 6 and over 12hrs. Overtime pay?
Joseph D. Allen's answer
If you are classified as non-exempt (even if salaried), then an employer needs to pay you for any overtime you actually work- at your "regular rate of pay." It does sound like your supervisory duties might (or might not) allow the employer to classify you as exempt- as long as you make enough money. However, if you have been told you are non-exempt, and the employer knows you are working more than 40 hours a week, you might have a claim. You should discuss all the circumstances with an...
If you are classified as non-exempt (even if salaried), then an employer needs to pay you for any overtime you actually work- at your "regular rate of pay." It does sound like your supervisory duties might (or might not) allow the employer to classify you as exempt- as long as you make enough money. However, if you have been told you are non-exempt, and the employer knows you are working more than 40 hours a week, you might have a claim. You should discuss all the circumstances with an...
Q: A sick leave law was passed in Montgomery County md My employer refuses to comply anything I can do?
1 Answer
| Asked
in
Employment Discrimination and Employment Law
for
Maryland
on
Answered on Oct 2, 2018
Answered on Oct 2, 2018
Joseph D. Allen's answer
Both Montgomery County and Maryland now have sick leave laws, and the employer has to comply with the provisions that provide the most protection to the employee. But depending on the size of the employer, the benefits may be limited. And there are employee tenure (length of employment) and hours worked requirements as well. You should speak with an employment/labor attorney about the facts of your situation.
Both Montgomery County and Maryland now have sick leave laws, and the employer has to comply with the provisions that provide the most protection to the employee. But depending on the size of the employer, the benefits may be limited. And there are employee tenure (length of employment) and hours worked requirements as well. You should speak with an employment/labor attorney about the facts of your situation.
Q: W2 employee supervising sub contractor
Joseph D. Allen's answer
The subcontractor's right to be paid/treated as employees is separate from your entitlement to be paid for your work. If you are not being paid for hours or overtime you work (and are non-exempt), then you would probably have a claim. On the other hand, if you are truly salaried exempt (and are classified appropriately), or simply think you should have a higher wage or salary, that would probably not be the basis for a claim.
The subcontractor's right to be paid/treated as employees is separate from your entitlement to be paid for your work. If you are not being paid for hours or overtime you work (and are non-exempt), then you would probably have a claim. On the other hand, if you are truly salaried exempt (and are classified appropriately), or simply think you should have a higher wage or salary, that would probably not be the basis for a claim.
Q: Does an employer have to provide a candidate a tentative offer letter of employment before conducting a background
Joseph D. Allen's answer
The EEOC strongly suggests employers give applicants a conditional (tentative) offer of employment before conducting background checks- for similar reasons that some jurisdictions have "ban-the-box" laws. It is to give people with histories of arrest or conviction a chance to get their foot in the door- after running the check and finding negative information, (with some exceptions) the employer is also supposed to do an "individualized assessment" of the applicant- as opposed to having a...
The EEOC strongly suggests employers give applicants a conditional (tentative) offer of employment before conducting background checks- for similar reasons that some jurisdictions have "ban-the-box" laws. It is to give people with histories of arrest or conviction a chance to get their foot in the door- after running the check and finding negative information, (with some exceptions) the employer is also supposed to do an "individualized assessment" of the applicant- as opposed to having a...
Q: Good evening, I was hired as a delivery driver, but my boss keeps giving me other jobs to do without compensation.
Joseph D. Allen's answer
The answer depends on whether you mean "extra" compensation for the other work, or "no" compensation. Generally, as long as the employer is paying you for the time you spend working, they do not need to pay you more for taking on extra tasks.
However, the minimum wage rules allow for the employer to pay a tipped employee less than minimum as long as the employee receives tips that at least make up for the difference. If these extra non-driving tasks (assuming you are a tipped...
The answer depends on whether you mean "extra" compensation for the other work, or "no" compensation. Generally, as long as the employer is paying you for the time you spend working, they do not need to pay you more for taking on extra tasks.
However, the minimum wage rules allow for the employer to pay a tipped employee less than minimum as long as the employee receives tips that at least make up for the difference. If these extra non-driving tasks (assuming you are a tipped...
Q: Do employers have to pay for work even if its under an hour?
Joseph D. Allen's answer
Employers can round up or down as much as 15 minutes, as long as the overall effect is not to fail to pay employees for time they work. As described, this practice does not appear to fit within permissible rounding- if they are simply not paying for shifts under an hour.
Employers can round up or down as much as 15 minutes, as long as the overall effect is not to fail to pay employees for time they work. As described, this practice does not appear to fit within permissible rounding- if they are simply not paying for shifts under an hour.
Q: what is the statue of limitations for employment contracts where compensation is owed?
Joseph D. Allen's answer
The Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law gives you 3 years to sue for unpaid earned wages or overtime. There is the potential (not guaranteed) for punitive damages up to 3 times the unpaid wages. If you truly had an employment contract, that might control whether you have the right to file suit (as opposed to being limited to arbitration). You should contact an employment lawyer to discuss the facts of your situation.
The Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law gives you 3 years to sue for unpaid earned wages or overtime. There is the potential (not guaranteed) for punitive damages up to 3 times the unpaid wages. If you truly had an employment contract, that might control whether you have the right to file suit (as opposed to being limited to arbitration). You should contact an employment lawyer to discuss the facts of your situation.
Q: Can in employer deny your job and say you’re not qualified if in the requirements section it does not state it
1 Answer
| Asked
in
Employment Discrimination and Employment Law
for
Maryland
on
Answered on Aug 13, 2018
Answered on Aug 13, 2018
Joseph D. Allen's answer
The job description is not definitive when it comes to the question of who is qualified to do the job. It can be strong evidence of what the employer considers qualified, but it is not a contract. But the larger issue is that the employer is not bound by their promise to promote you when you turned 18. Unless you have a written employment contract, they can always change their minds- for instance, based on their misunderstanding that you had a high school degree. Based on the facts you put...
The job description is not definitive when it comes to the question of who is qualified to do the job. It can be strong evidence of what the employer considers qualified, but it is not a contract. But the larger issue is that the employer is not bound by their promise to promote you when you turned 18. Unless you have a written employment contract, they can always change their minds- for instance, based on their misunderstanding that you had a high school degree. Based on the facts you put...
Q: I was fired by a major retailer for breaking their external shoplifting policy when I did not. Do I have a case?
Joseph D. Allen's answer
There are two separate issues here. The first is whether the employer broke the law by terminating you without good cause (or even any cause). Unfortunately, without more facts indicating that you were retaliated or discriminated against, your employer may legally terminate you- even if it isn't fair. The second issue is whether you are entitled to unemployment benefits. There it sounds like you have a fairly strong case that you were not terminated for gross misconduct. Depending on where...
There are two separate issues here. The first is whether the employer broke the law by terminating you without good cause (or even any cause). Unfortunately, without more facts indicating that you were retaliated or discriminated against, your employer may legally terminate you- even if it isn't fair. The second issue is whether you are entitled to unemployment benefits. There it sounds like you have a fairly strong case that you were not terminated for gross misconduct. Depending on where...
Q: Is it legal for your employer to get video surveillance and proof of purchase receipts from another establishment?
1 Answer
| Asked
in
Employment Discrimination and Employment Law
for
Maryland
on
Answered on Aug 7, 2018
Answered on Aug 7, 2018
Joseph D. Allen's answer
There does not appear to be anything wrong or illegal about gathering the surveillance video and receipts. However, if the only employee that was fired was not drinking (the video should back this up)- and the only one fired- this could potentially be a discrimination claim. Your partner should discuss with a labor and employment attorney.
There does not appear to be anything wrong or illegal about gathering the surveillance video and receipts. However, if the only employee that was fired was not drinking (the video should back this up)- and the only one fired- this could potentially be a discrimination claim. Your partner should discuss with a labor and employment attorney.
Q: I applied for a promotion with the company and was turned down for the job and someone was hired but was asked to do the
1 Answer
| Asked
in
Employment Discrimination and Employment Law
for
Maryland
on
Answered on Aug 2, 2018
Answered on Aug 2, 2018
Joseph D. Allen's answer
There are too many unknown factors involved here for a comprehensive answer. Generally, an employer can ask you to do additional tasks without an increase in pay. You suggest that there could be discrimination involved, but provide no basis on which to evaluate whether there is any sort of discrimination by the employer in the failure to promote/give raise or the disciplinary action. It may be worthwhile to speak with an employment/labor attorney who offers free initial consultations.
There are too many unknown factors involved here for a comprehensive answer. Generally, an employer can ask you to do additional tasks without an increase in pay. You suggest that there could be discrimination involved, but provide no basis on which to evaluate whether there is any sort of discrimination by the employer in the failure to promote/give raise or the disciplinary action. It may be worthwhile to speak with an employment/labor attorney who offers free initial consultations.
Q: Should I take legal action against my boss?
1 Answer
| Asked
in
Civil Rights, Employment Law, Workers' Compensation and Employment Discrimination
for
Maryland
on
Answered on Jul 26, 2018
Answered on Jul 26, 2018
Joseph D. Allen's answer
As far as injuries to yourself and related medical expenses, your situation seems to fall squarely under the workers compensation system. Any non-injury related damages you incurred (or potentially damages to the unborn child) might or might not fall outside workers compensation. It certainly seems inconsiderate and foolish of your employer to have you fill out the incident report form before getting medical care- but it is not clear whether that would create civil liability outside the...
As far as injuries to yourself and related medical expenses, your situation seems to fall squarely under the workers compensation system. Any non-injury related damages you incurred (or potentially damages to the unborn child) might or might not fall outside workers compensation. It certainly seems inconsiderate and foolish of your employer to have you fill out the incident report form before getting medical care- but it is not clear whether that would create civil liability outside the...
Q: Is it legal for a company to reduce a salary rate of a tenured employee because the position has been eliminated?
Joseph D. Allen's answer
Generally speaking, it is legal for a Maryland employer to reduce pay and eliminate job positions. Tenure is typically a separate matter governed by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA)- which would define your rights by contract. That said, there could be other motivations that would potentially make the action illegal- such as age or other discrimination, or retaliation.
Generally speaking, it is legal for a Maryland employer to reduce pay and eliminate job positions. Tenure is typically a separate matter governed by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA)- which would define your rights by contract. That said, there could be other motivations that would potentially make the action illegal- such as age or other discrimination, or retaliation.
Q: I have a promissory note from may 2018, hired april 2016. Doesnt this supersede employee handbook signed april 2016?
Mark Oakley's answer
Insofar as the specific terms of the promissory note go, yes. On other matters not addressed by the promissory note, the employee handbook, which presumably is made part of the terms and agreement of your employment contract, then it still governs.
Insofar as the specific terms of the promissory note go, yes. On other matters not addressed by the promissory note, the employee handbook, which presumably is made part of the terms and agreement of your employment contract, then it still governs.
Q: Can Delaware north sports group at Camden yards take a non profit volunteer without permission of the sub contractors
1 Answer
| Asked
in
Employment Discrimination, Employment Law and Entertainment / Sports
for
Maryland
on
Answered on May 28, 2018
Answered on May 28, 2018
John Espinosa's answer
This sounds like a matter of contract. Have any attorney review the applicable contracts with your subcontractors to determine if you need their pernission or not.
This sounds like a matter of contract. Have any attorney review the applicable contracts with your subcontractors to determine if you need their pernission or not.
Q: I am a physician that is paid hourly but has a guaranteed minimum amount of hours that I am paid for.
Mark Oakley's answer
While you should certainly consult an employment lawyer, I am aware of no law that would disallow a contract provision of the type you describe. It sounds as though the new owner does not like the minimum base compensation they are bound to pay under the employment contracts they purchased—and are bound to comply with— along with the purchase of the business. Stick to your guns and demand they honor their end of the bargain.
While you should certainly consult an employment lawyer, I am aware of no law that would disallow a contract provision of the type you describe. It sounds as though the new owner does not like the minimum base compensation they are bound to pay under the employment contracts they purchased—and are bound to comply with— along with the purchase of the business. Stick to your guns and demand they honor their end of the bargain.
Q: Received a subpoena for a copy of my personnel record from the Maryland SW Board. Do I have to comply? Do I have
Mark Oakley's answer
Who served the subpoena? The Board? And they served your employer? The Board has authority to investigate licensed Social Workers under its jurisdiction, but it is subject to certain requirements and you have due process rights. You have the right to file an objection in court to a subpoena of your records, if you have a legal basis to do so, such as the Board exceeding its authority. Consult a lawyer in private about what concerns you may have and what steps you should take to protect yourself.
Who served the subpoena? The Board? And they served your employer? The Board has authority to investigate licensed Social Workers under its jurisdiction, but it is subject to certain requirements and you have due process rights. You have the right to file an objection in court to a subpoena of your records, if you have a legal basis to do so, such as the Board exceeding its authority. Consult a lawyer in private about what concerns you may have and what steps you should take to protect yourself.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
