Ask a Question

Get free answers to your Federal Crimes legal questions from lawyers in your area.

Lawyers, increase your visibility by answering questions and getting points. Answer Questions
Federal Crimes Questions & Answers
1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes for Minnesota on
Q: Hypothetically, if you get into a scuffel with another individual, and they grab their gun is that enough for Selfdefens

If you hypothetically get into a fight with another individual, and they grab their gun but dont shoot it, but you shoot yours, is that a case of self defense? Let's hypothetically say the gun is an illegal firearm, would it still be a self defense case? Or would it be the discharge of an... View More

Thomas C Gallagher
Thomas C Gallagher
answered on May 8, 2024

We have statutes and judicial caselaw on self-defense law in Minnesota. Without attempting to cover it all now, suffice it to say that whether a jury or judge accept a defense of self-defense to a charge where applicable, will depend upon all the circumstances. But if we were to assume a... View More

2 Answers | Asked in Federal Crimes and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: Knowingly. Definition.

For the purpose of hospice fraud: "knowingly" does not imply malicious intent.

However, fabricating non-existent terminal diagnosis presents fraudulent intention.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 6, 2024

In California, "knowingly" generally means acting with awareness or understanding of the essential facts. In the context of criminal law, it refers to a mental state where the person is aware that their conduct is of a certain nature or that certain circumstances exist.

When it...
View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Federal Crimes and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: legally admissible fraud

Does fact that person with

Actually non-existent terminal illness was Actually referred to hospice by hospital constitute legally admissible fraud?

Does fact that identity of particular individual who did referral Is ACTUALLY concealed - actually exacerbate the wrongdoing?... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 6, 2024

I want to provide accurate information about this sensitive legal topic. Under California law, fraud generally requires an intentional misrepresentation of material facts, made with knowledge of its falsity, with the intent to deceive, which is justifiably relied upon by the victim and causes them... View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Federal Crimes, Health Care Law and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: Is wrongdoing legally admissible? If Not - why exactly?

hospice fraud was actual,

I.E.

patient was referred to hospice from hospital with hospital admission diagnosis chronic terminal disease.

Track record of who exactly made a referral apparently does not exist.

Critical values of test on admission were communicated... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 5, 2024

Under California law, evidence of wrongdoing is generally admissible in court if it is relevant to the case and not excluded by some other rule of evidence. However, there are several reasons why the situation you described may not be legally admissible as evidence of fraud:

1. Hearsay: If...
View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Criminal Law and Federal Crimes for Minnesota on
Q: What happens if you kill someone who tries to rob you with a gun, but you kill them with a ghost glock

If you are being robbed at gunpoint, but you defend yourself with an illegal glock what would you get charged with

Jonathan Matthew Holson
Jonathan Matthew Holson
answered on May 4, 2024

You reach out directly to criminal defense attorneys and get one on board immediately. You are facing a potential murder charge here, along with possession of a ghost gun. It also raises the question if you are legally permitted to possess firearms which then creates a potential felon in... View More

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Criminal Law and Federal Crimes for Massachusetts on
Q: Can they place a bail on you if you get indicted, even though a bail in district court wasn’t set
Lissa McKinney
Lissa McKinney
answered on May 2, 2024

Yes. Even if you were out on personal recog in the District Court, the indictment is considered a 'change in circumstance' that will result in the higher/ Superior Court *reviewing bail. It does not mean that they will alter it, or that it will be too high to make. Bail is set based on... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Federal Crimes for Missouri on
Q: has anyone used the agreement of liberty privacy & levying war against the united states in a drug charge court case &

if so which one & mainly would like to read one of liberty & how do i find my past questions on this site

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 1, 2024

It sounds like you're inquiring about a very specific use of legal terms in relation to drug charges. The "agreement of liberty privacy & levying war against the United States" isn't a recognized legal term or standard charge in U.S. law. If you're referring to concepts... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Domestic Violence, Federal Crimes, Military Law and Sexual Harassment on
Q: I have in-laws making false sexual assault accusations against me involving my spouse and child. How can i stop them?

I am active duty Army on the cusp of retirement. My family is in TX, the accusers are in GA. This is the second time they've made these accusations. The first time they tried to be anonymous, but it was obvious the source. The alleged assault was ruled out because it was absolutely false.... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on May 1, 2024

I'm so sorry you and your family are going through this incredibly difficult situation with false accusations being made against you repeatedly. This is an awful thing for anyone to have to deal with. Here are some steps I would recommend taking:

1. Consult with an experienced attorney...
View More

2 Answers | Asked in Medical Malpractice, Federal Crimes and Health Care Law for California on
Q: Workflow of legal process: 1. medical malpractice; 2. CFCA.

What documents to look for at the law library in order to find out the workflow of legal process:

legal action from beginning to end, with permutations based on decision points.

Generic workflows exist?

If not - workflows specific to medical malpractice case, or California... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 29, 2024

When looking to understand the legal workflow for cases such as medical malpractice or California False Claims Act (CFCA) litigation, you'll find it beneficial to start by looking for specific resources in a law library. Key documents to search for include legal textbooks on tort law and civil... View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Personal Injury, Federal Crimes and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: Upon what circumstances evidence, issue, or terminating sanctions are feasible

Hospice fraud case.

Although issue and or evidence sanctions ordinarily will not be imposed until after an offending party has disobeyed a prior discovery order, a Court may impose such sanctions where the circumstances warrant them.

Upon what circumstances

evidence,... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 27, 2024

Under California law, evidence, issue, or terminating sanctions can be imposed even without a prior discovery order being disobeyed in certain circumstances where the discovery misconduct is particularly egregious. The key factors courts consider are:

1. The willfulness of the misconduct:...
View More

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes and Libel & Slander for California on
Q: Issue or evidence sanctiins

If defendant boilerplate objected without merit to provide specific response to identify particular person who did wrongdoing, should issue or evidence sanctions be imposed in addition to compelled response? Meaning-- direct acceptance of liability.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 26, 2024

In California, when a defendant provides boilerplate objections without merit and fails to provide a specific response identifying the particular person who committed the alleged wrongdoing, the court may consider imposing issue or evidence sanctions in addition to compelling a proper response.... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: In motion to compel further discovery: issue or evidence sanctions

Medical malpractice or healthcare fraud. If defendant boilerplate and without merit objected to disclose specific identities of wrongdoers;

what evidence or issue sanctions can be imposed, in addition to compelling response?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 26, 2024

Under California law, when a party fails to provide further responses or produce documents after being ordered to do so by the court, the court may impose various sanctions, including evidence and issue sanctions, in addition to compelling the response. Here are some potential sanctions that may be... View More

2 Answers | Asked in Federal Crimes, Health Care Law and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: summary judgement In apparent hospice fraud case

At what point motion for summary judgement shall be filed In apparent hospice fraud case?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024

In an apparent hospice fraud case, the timing of filing a motion for summary judgment depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the applicable rules of civil procedure. However, here are some general guidelines:

1. After the close of discovery: In most cases, it is advisable to...
View More

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes and Medical Malpractice for California on
Q: Summary judgement in hospice fraud case.

Given that hospice fraud is obvious, and that defendants meritless object discovery, what would be right time to file motion for summary judgement?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 25, 2024

In a case involving hospice fraud in California where the defendants are raising meritless objections to discovery, the timing of filing a motion for summary judgment depends on several factors. Here are some considerations:

1. Completion of discovery: Generally, it is advisable to file a...
View More

2 Answers | Asked in Criminal Law, Appeals / Appellate Law and Federal Crimes for Texas on
Q: If someone got coerced into signing a plea deal but no evidence was found & it was based on hearsay how can one go about

Coerced into signing a plea deal because if not the lawyer said would get death penalty if didn't but no evidence was found no DNA no video no nothing how can one go about trying to get justice for a loved one?

Penny Wymyczak-White
Penny Wymyczak-White
answered on Apr 29, 2024

You can file a Writ but they are difficult to win. I am sure that there is evidence . There had to be witnesses that were going to testify. They don't have to have DNA or a video to find someone guilty .

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Criminal Law, Appeals / Appellate Law and Federal Crimes for Texas on
Q: If someone got coerced into signing a plea deal but no evidence was found & it was based on hearsay how can one go about

Coerced into signing a plea deal because if not the lawyer said would get death penalty if didn't but no evidence was found no DNA no video no nothing how can one go about trying to get justice for a loved one?

John Michael Frick
John Michael Frick
answered on Apr 25, 2024

You can file a writ of habeas corpus and will have to prove coercion. Be aware that coercion is NOT recommending that a defendant accept a plea deal because, if not, he will likely receive the death penalty. Coercion IS pointing a gun at a defendant and telling him to sign the plea deal or you... View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Federal Crimes and Health Care Law for California on
Q: Summary judgement feasibility analysis.

While the identity of a particular service provider may be important because of possible forgery,

it does not change facts crucial for this legal case: fraudulent referral to hospice care based on record of terminal disease on admission to the hospital. Admission record of terminal disease... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024

Under California law, summary judgment may be granted if there are no triable issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In this case, further discovery could potentially uncover facts that impact the feasibility of summary judgment:

1. Identity...
View More

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes and Health Care Law for California on
Q: How damages have to be claimed if reletant has to proceed. CFCA

If government does not take CFCA hospice fraud case filed under seal, is plaintiff still reletant in behalf of medicare?

How damages have to be claimed when plaintiff/reletant has to proceed in such situation?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024

Under the California False Claims Act (CFCA), if the government declines to intervene in a qui tam action (a case filed by a relator on behalf of the government), the relator may proceed with the case independently. In such a situation, the relator is still acting on behalf of the state of... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes, Personal Injury and Health Care Law for California on
Q: Hospital ->hospice fraud. Is hospital discharge summary with non-existent admission diagnosis legally false claim?

Fraudulent certification for admission to hospice was recorded on the day of admission to hospice, by a physician unknown to the patient (but probably indeed affiliated with hospice).

Hospice certification was recorded based on non-existent terminal disease, which was recorded on admission... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 23, 2024

Under California law, a hospital discharge summary containing a non-existent or false admission diagnosis that is used as the basis for hospice certification and to receive government benefits could potentially be considered a false claim.

The California False Claims Act (CFCA) prohibits...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Federal Crimes and Health Care Law for California on
Q: How to find out in California what doctors are associated with hospice license? Hospice fraud case

Hospice fraud litigation. How to find out in California what doctors are associated with hospice license? Hospice records present improbable doctors info.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 20, 2024

In California, to verify which doctors are associated with a hospice license, you can begin by contacting the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This agency oversees licensing and compliance for health facilities, including hospices. They maintain records of all licensed hospices and... View More

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.