Get free answers to your Legal Malpractice legal questions from lawyers in your area.
Your current state is Ohio
What date of creation of document has to do with asserted privilege for non-disclosure of document?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
The date a document was created can be relevant to whether it is protected by attorney-client privilege or work product privilege and therefore shielded from disclosure during litigation. A few key considerations:
Attorney-Client Privilege
- For attorney-client privilege to apply,... View More 
What is the reason to request 'any, all, every, etc. documents that demonstrate employment or contractual relationship' instead of specific 'provide contractual or employment agreement'?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
There are a few key reasons why legal demands or document requests often use broad, inclusive language like "any, all, every, etc." rather than only requesting specific documents:
1. Ensuring comprehensiveness: By requesting "any and all" documents related to an... View More
Demand for privilege log for all interrogatories and demands in the latest sets is propounded as one of production demands?
Privilege log not requested for previous discovery requests, not in the latest sets, may be negotiable?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
Here are a few key points regarding requesting privilege logs in the discovery process:
1. Timing of request: It is generally advisable to request a privilege log early in the discovery process, typically at the same time as serving interrogatories and document requests. However, if not... View More
Why privilege log does not apply to interrogatories?
If it does- where it defined?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
In California, a privilege log is typically not required when responding to interrogatories, as opposed to requests for production of documents. This is because interrogatories seek information, not the production of privileged documents. However, there are some exceptions and nuances to consider:... View More
Is production demand implied to have matching interrogatory?
For example: for proof of affiliation contractual or employment agreement specifically demanded. It does not seem like interrogatory to identify agreement would add clarity in such situation.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
In California, interrogatories and requests for production of documents are two separate discovery tools, and they are not necessarily required to match or correlate with each other.
1. Interrogatories: These are written questions that one party sends to another, requiring the responding... View More
In civil unlimited case, are production demands included into count of 35?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
In California, the "Rule of 35" refers to the limit on the number of specially prepared interrogatories that a party can propound to any other party in a civil unlimited case, as per California Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.030.
However, the limit of 35 does not apply to... View More
What rule or statute defines amount of production demands in discovery?
Is separate declaration for demands over 35 required? Can declaration be combined with declaration re: additional interrogatories?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
In California, the rules governing discovery in civil cases are primarily found in the Civil Discovery Act, which is part of the California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP).
1. Regarding the number of production demands:
CCP § 2031.030 states that a party may demand the production of... View More
Section 2032.240 c(2) does not define format of privilege log. Which rule of statute defines?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
There is no specific California statute that prescribes the exact format for a privilege log required under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2032.240(c)(2), which relates to demanding the production of documents in response to a demand for a physical examination.
However, the... View More
Since format of privilege log does not seem to be defined by any statute or rule;
does usually party propounding demand for privilege log specify what information should be provided by responding party in privilege log?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 18, 2024
In California, there is no specific statute or rule that prescribes the format of a privilege log. However, it is common practice for the party propounding the demand for a privilege log to specify the information they expect to be included. This helps ensure that the responding party provides... View More
In order to use a deposition as evidence in a civil case during trial, will the deposition have to be filed in court before the trial date and once filed then it can be added to the exhibit list? Is the proper procedure?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 19, 2024
In California, depositions taken during the discovery phase do not necessarily need to be filed with the court before the trial date in order to be used as evidence during the trial. However, there are certain procedures that must be followed to properly introduce deposition testimony as evidence.... View More
How to initiate request for privilege log with defense, when request for privilege log is production request?
What statute/rule of court defines this process?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024
In California, the process for requesting a privilege log is governed by the California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and the California Rules of Court (CRC). Here are the relevant rules and statutes:
1. CCP § 2031.240 - Motion to Compel Further Response to Inspection Demand:
If a... View More
In this particular case, the question is not about defendant to depose plaintiff.
The question is about defendant's responses to 'produce person for deposition' in instead of disclosure of inquired identity.
In this case plaintiff cannot be obliged to depose a person,... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024
Under California law, a protective order is a court order that is designed to protect a person from harassment, stalking, or abuse. It can be used to prevent the defendant from contacting the plaintiff, coming near them, or engaging in other specified behaviors.
In the context of a legal... View More
Defendant hospital can find many triggers for objections. However, when subject matter of particular discovery responses is crucial for the case,
Motion to compel with demand to produce privilege log Is the only tool available to obtain any meaningful responses?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024
Under California law, when a defendant hospital objects to discovery requests and the subject matter of those requests is crucial to the case, filing a motion to compel along with a demand for a privilege log can be an effective tool to obtain meaningful responses. Here's why:
1.... View More
Can responses by defense 'defense will produce person for deposition' enforce on plaintiff deposing person? What statute defines that?
Why plaintiff can be forced to file additional motion for protective order?
Can plaintiff instead propound specific discovery request for... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024
In a lawsuit involving an allegation of hospice fraud in Los Angeles, if the defense responds to a plaintiff's request for information by stating they "will produce a person for deposition," it does not automatically obligate the plaintiff to depose that person. The plaintiff has the... View More
With depositions out of question: How to legally verify that hospital/provider contracts, disclosed by hospital are authentic?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024
Under California law, there are a few ways to legally verify the authenticity of hospital/provider contracts without relying on depositions:
1. Request certified copies: You can request certified copies of the contracts directly from the hospital. A certified copy is a copy of a document... View More
Producing person by defense for deposition instead of verifiable data.
Isn't such response of defense burdensome, oppressing and harassing for in pro per plaintiff who propounds request for verifiable data or documents?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024
Under California law, the use of depositions as a means of obtaining information that could be more easily obtained through other discovery methods, such as interrogatories or requests for production of documents, can be considered oppressive, burdensome, and harassing, particularly for... View More
Defenses HAS TO make a reasonable a good faith effort to obtain information for proper response,
as clearly defined by CCP § 2030.220(c).
But
according to Defense, unless more specific question is asked about information
that is in the defendant's... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 17, 2024
In California, the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 2030.220(c) requires a party responding to interrogatories to make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information needed to provide a proper response. If the responding party (in this case, the defense) fails to do so and instead... View More
In order to achieve verifiable authentic data.
Contract or employment term with hospital provider includes identification of the person. Discoverable?
Is profession, license id included, degree, dob protected in discovery?
What data of hospital provider does not fall under... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 16, 2024
In legal discovery in California, there are certain types of data related to hospital providers that are considered privileged and protected from disclosure, while other types of data are generally discoverable. Here's a breakdown:
Privileged data (generally not discoverable without... View More
Motion for protective order is not relevant for the situation.
Plaintiff requests defendant to create privilege log in production request and to disclose private information of individuals.
Can motion for camera review and motion for court order for disclosure of private data be... View More
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 16, 2024
Here are the steps I would recommend for handling this situation in California:
1. Serve the production requests and special interrogatories on the defendant. In the requests, ask the defendant to produce a privilege log identifying any documents withheld on the basis of privilege. Also... View More
Res Ispa Loquiture in respect to fraud/unauthorized disclosure of medical info.
California case law does not appear to support applicability of Res Ispa Loquiture in respect to fraud/unauthorized disclosure of medical info.
Unless there specific authorities in support, inquired.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jun 15, 2024
Under California law, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is typically applied in cases involving negligence, where the injury or harm would not ordinarily occur without someone's negligence, and the defendant had exclusive control over the instrumentality causing the injury. However, its... View More
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
