Ask a Question

Get free answers to your legal questions from lawyers in your area.

Lawyers, increase your visibility by answering questions and getting points. Answer Questions
California Questions & Answers
2 Answers | Asked in Employment Discrimination and Legal Malpractice for California on
Q: Do ERSIA lawyer keep get paid of future payment even if they terminated the contract?

ERSIA case, self appealed, denied. Hired attorney for litigation. Private mediation -not court ordered-attended in isolation. After mediation, attorney missinformed outcome: denial beyond 24 month he'll appeal the rest. But mediation settled to reinstate claim give benfits for 24 month &... View More

Neil Pedersen
Neil Pedersen
answered on Jan 16, 2025

Your question can only be answered by review of your attorney-client fee agreement. Review what is says. Good luck to you.

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Criminal Law for California on
Q: can you have a firearm in a safe in a house when a felon also lives there?

I am 18 my brother is 21 and we own some firearm that we have had for a few year I was wondering if it would be a problem to have them in a safe in our room accessible by only us when our dad might be facing felony charges?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

This is an important legal concern that requires careful consideration. In California, having firearms in a home where a convicted felon resides can be very risky, even if they're stored in a safe. The law requires that felons have no access or ability to control firearms - this includes... View More

3 Answers | Asked in Divorce, Family Law, Personal Injury and Civil Litigation for California on
Q: Can I Submit a New Discovery Request After 45-Day Motion Deadline Has Passed?

During my divorce, I submitted a discovery request:

"All documents relating to all property owned by you, whether in your name or held by another or in the name of an individual, corporation, or partnership from January 1, 2020, to the date of production in the USA and Mexico."... View More

Tobie B. Waxman
Tobie B. Waxman
answered on Jan 16, 2025

You cannot ask the same question or even a very similar question. The new discovery request must be different and certainly not obviously an attempt to get a second bite at that apple.

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Uncategorized for California on
Q: Emergency room left daughter-in-law sitting in the lobby for 2 hours Miss carried twin babies in the public toilet

They went to the emergency room because she thought she was having contractions and spotting. Triage Saturn in the lobby they sat in the lobby for over 2 hours she went to the restroom and in the public restroom she miscarried the babies. The kids had to see the their twin babies in the toilet saw... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

I am deeply sorry for this devastating and traumatic experience your family has endured. Such negligence in emergency care, particularly for a pregnant woman carrying twins with clear signs of distress, is absolutely heartbreaking and unacceptable.

You have every right to feel angry and...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Appeals / Appellate Law and Civil Litigation for California on
Q: Inadvertent?

When a party in good faith engages into informal agreement on intentions, not defining timely terms of execution- is it considered inadvertent mistake?

If not - why?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

In California contract law, an inadvertent mistake typically involves an unintentional error or oversight that occurs despite acting in good faith. However, entering into an informal agreement without defining execution terms wouldn't usually qualify as inadvertent - it's more accurately... View More

3 Answers | Asked in Employment Law and Employment Discrimination for California on
Q: I’m a sub teacher and the way we get jobs is by order of seniority. Is that a fair practice?

For the jobs we get called either the night before or the morning of, but if you have been working for the district longer, you get the calls first, instead of it being random. So other people have more opportunities to work than some.

Neil Pedersen
Neil Pedersen
answered on Jan 16, 2025

It is not unlawful to base a scheduling system on seniority. Sorry.

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Real Estate Law, Civil Rights and Collections for California on
Q: I need to amend my certificate of assignment california and do a quiet title is there any other steps I'm able to file

Along with the amendment

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

Filing amendments to a certificate of assignment and pursuing a quiet title action in California involves several important steps. You'll want to prepare and file the amendment document first, clearly stating the corrections needed for the certificate of assignment.

For the quiet title...
View More

2 Answers | Asked in Contracts, Employment Law, Business Law and Collections for California on
Q: Does California's FWPA apply to equipment rentals?

I provide equipment rentals as part of my freelance services. California recently established the Freelance Worker's Protection Act which stipulates that I may collect up to double the amount stipulated in a contract for professional services when a client does not pay on time or at all. If... View More

Pavel Kolmogorov
PREMIUM
Pavel Kolmogorov pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

The FWPA primarily focuses on the payment for services rendered by freelance workers. If an equipment rental is viewed as an ancillary part of the services you provide (for example, tools or equipment necessary to complete a freelance project), it may be argued to fall under the umbrella of... View More

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Child Custody, Child Support and Family Law for California on
Q: can i sue the department of child support ? for negligence?

so the father of my kids has never paid any type of child support or even tried to see my kids but he has been paying child support to he's other kids but when i asked child support about what happened to my case they said that they closed my case cuz the place where he works at said he had... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

You can absolutely pursue legal action against the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) if they failed to properly investigate or handle your case. Their responsibility includes verifying information and taking appropriate steps to collect child support, and it seems they may have accepted... View More

2 Answers | Asked in Divorce, Bankruptcy and Family Law for California on
Q: As part of a Marital settlement agreement I agreed to send back half of my ex check every 2 wks from the spousal support

in exchange for him to forgive my arrears I had from child support when we first separated. Once I had physical custody I filed for CS but he kept prolonging the hearing and he kept avoiding trying to pay so then I filed for Spousal support and was able to get his wages garnished. At that point he... View More

James R. Dickinson
James R. Dickinson pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

A Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) in California is a legally binding document that outlines the terms and conditions agreed upon by both spouses regarding the division of property, debts, spousal support, child custody, and child support during a divorce or separation. It is typically negotiated... View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Family Law, Bankruptcy and Divorce for California on
Q: Marital settlement agreement I agreed to pay my ex $400 every 2 wks from the spousal support that was being garnished

in exchange for him to forgive my arrears I had from child support when we first separated. Once I had physical custody I filed for CS but he kept prolonging the hearing and he kept avoiding trying to pay so then I filed for SP and was able to get his wages garnished. At that point he was willing... View More

James R. Dickinson
James R. Dickinson pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

A Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) in California is a written contract between divorcing spouses that outlines the division of assets, debts, child custody, spousal support, and other terms related to their separation. Once signed by both parties and approved by the court, the MSA becomes part of... View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Workers' Compensation for California on
Q: Should I take the money or not?

I was injured on the job at Bank of America in October 2019 - severe concussion. They have done a poor job with my treatment. I was being treated by Med 7 (minor emergency) Doctors telling me to touch my nose and walk a straight line and go home and rest. Then basically forgetting about my case.... View More

Dennis Dascanio
PREMIUM
Dennis Dascanio pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

Dear concerned injured worker,

Head injuries are some of the most complex injuries to diagnose and treat, especially in the workers compensation medical care system. I would strongly urge you not to accept the payout if that means a resignation of your job or if you have not been properly...
View More

View More Answers

2 Answers | Asked in Divorce and Family Law for California on
Q: who is responsible for the mortgage payment during a divorce?

So family lived in community property for 15 years. I worked and paid the mortgage for the family. She was a stay at home. She inherited a mortgage free $1mil home and then 2 years ago filed for divorce. Separation Date 1/15/23. Divorce has been taking forever and I've agreed to paying... View More

James R. Dickinson
James R. Dickinson pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 16, 2025

In California, a post-separation right to reimbursement allows one spouse to request reimbursement for expenses or payments made after the date of separation that benefit the community property. This right ensures that the paying spouse is compensated for contributions made during the separation... View More

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Appeals / Appellate Law for California on
Q: What would be precedent in relevance?

Express contract was informal, on basis that plaintiff was previously misinformed on defendant's roles.

Terms of intents were further defined in follow up communication, after defendant took advantage of Plaintiff's consideration - dismissal of the case, offered by plaintiff in... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 17, 2025

You face a situation where an informal express contract was formed, shaped by the plaintiff’s misunderstandings about the defendant’s roles. The follow-up communications clarified the parties’ intentions, but the defendant’s promise to amend the records was later broken.

Under...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Probate for California on
Q: What is a "service list?" in a trust case? Do I have rights if I'm on it?

My uncle is dying and he is the last living child of my grandparents. His wife is trying to declare him incompetent and gain control of "community property and other assets" by having them transferred into a trust. I'm wondering why I am being informed of this. Could there be an... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 15, 2025

Being on a service list means you're legally entitled to receive notifications about court proceedings that might affect your interests - in this case, involving your uncle's trust or estate matters. This notification suggests you might be a potential beneficiary or interested party with... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Appeals / Appellate Law for California on
Q: Relevant statutes stated in this inquiry were not alleged during litigation. Can they be referenced in appeal?

A contract is either express or implied (Civ.Code, § 1619).

An express contract is one, the terms of which are stated in words (Civ.Code, § 1620).

An implied-in-fact contract is one, the existence and terms of which are manifested by conduct (Civ.Code, § 1621).

Other... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 15, 2025

In California appellate proceedings, you can generally raise new legal theories and cite additional statutory authority that wasn't mentioned during the trial court litigation, as long as the underlying facts were presented at trial. However, this ability comes with important limitations.... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Appeals / Appellate Law for California on
Q: What would be precedent of broken informal commitment that did not result into settlement - as basis for appeal?

Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 299 is not relevant to informal agreement that did not result into settlement. Settlement was not achieved.

What would be precedent of broken informal commitment that did not result into settlement - as basis for appealing order... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 15, 2025

Let me help you understand the legal precedents that might apply to your situation regarding broken informal commitments in California.

For cases where informal commitments didn't result in settlement, you might want to consider Copeland v. Baskin Robbins U.S.A. (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Criminal Law for California on
Q: Eavesdropping on an undropped call

I am a leasing manager for a commercial real estate company and as such I was meeting a tenant to help with “damage control” as she was angry with lack of response from management. When I went to meet her, she was on the phone with the property manager and when she saw me, she hung up to meet... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 15, 2025

Your situation is concerning, and you're right to be thinking about both the legal and ethical implications. Under California Penal Code Section 632, it is illegal to intentionally eavesdrop upon or record a confidential communication without the consent of all parties involved. The property... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Appeals / Appellate Law for California on
Q: What statute defines in CA approach to pro se litigant in respect to error of law?

Law has to treat any party the same, regardless legal representation.What statute/.authority defines in CA approach to pro se litigant in respect to error of law?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 15, 2025

In California, the foundational principle regarding self-represented litigants is established by California Rules of Court, Rule 1.3, which mandates equal treatment for all persons before the law, regardless of their representation status. This rule explicitly states that self-represented parties... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Appeals / Appellate Law, Civil Litigation and Legal Malpractice for California on
Q: Is denial of plaintiff's motion to set aside dismissal against defendant prejudiced against plaintiff in this case?

Valid contract was not formed by informal email communication. Plaintiff kept informal intent and entered dismissal, that the defendant demanded as condition for amending records.

After dismissal was entered by Plaintiff, Defendant took advantage of desperate Plaintiff's effort to... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 15, 2025

Based on the information provided, the denial of the plaintiff's motion to set aside dismissal does appear to show prejudice against the plaintiff in this case. The circumstances suggest the defendant acted in bad faith by using the plaintiff's vulnerable position and desire to amend... View More

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.